|
May 2008
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FOR
ELKTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Effective
Learning
Kindles
Success
GILES COUNTY
176 COLLEGE STREET
ELKTON, TENNESSEE 38455
BOBBY POLLY, PRINCIPAL
Tennessee School Improvement Planning Process
(TSIPP)
Assurances
with Signature of Principal
I certify that Elkton
Elementary School has
utilized the data and other requirements requested for each
component. The school will operate its programs in accordance
with all of the required assurances and certifications for each
program area.
I CERTIFY that the assurances referenced above have been
satisfied to the best of my knowledge.
__________________________________ ___________________________
Signature of Principal Date signed
Component 1a – School Profile and Collaborative Process
1.1: SIP Leadership Team Composition
|
SIP Leadership Team Member Name |
Leader-
ship Chair? (Y/N) |
Position |
Name of Subcommittee(s) (when applicable) |
|
Rita McDonald |
Y |
Teacher, Leadership Team |
|
|
Teri Mize |
Y |
Teacher, Leadership Team |
Co-Chair- Component 5 |
|
Connie Walls |
Y |
Teacher, Leadership Team |
Co-Chair- Component 5 |
|
Bobby Polly |
N |
Principal |
|
|
Angela Mayes |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 1A |
|
Brent Newton |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 1B |
|
Pam Scott |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 1B |
|
Susan Holley |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 2 |
|
Nadine Herrington |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 3-Curriculum |
|
Jennifer Wilsford |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 3-Instruction |
|
Kelley Deason |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 3-Assessment |
|
Joshilyn Tucker |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 3-Organization |
|
Carol Abernathy |
Y |
Teacher |
Component 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2: Subcommittee Formation and Operation
|
Subcommittee for
COMPONENT 1 School
Profile and Collaborative Process |
|
Member Name |
Position |
Chair |
|
Angela Mayes |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Melody Putman |
Secretary |
|
|
Brent Newton |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Pam Scott |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Claudia Davis |
Teacher |
|
|
Mary Jane Gentry |
Teaching Assistant |
|
|
Nikki Riddle |
Teacher |
|
|
Sherry Newman |
Teacher |
|
|
|
|
|
Component 1 Subcommittee has met to
address critical components of the SIP and minutes are
on file. |
x YES |
NO |
|
|
|
Subcommittee 1 Chair Signature |
|
Subcommittee for
COMPONENT 2 Beliefs, Mission and Vision |
|
Member Name |
Position |
Chair |
|
Susan Holley |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Tammy Gaudette |
Teaching Assistant |
|
|
Ricky Rose |
Teacher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component 2 Subcommittee has met to
address critical components of the SIP and minutes are
on file. |
x YES |
NO |
|
|
|
Subcommittee 2 Chair Signature |
|
Subcommittee
for
COMPONENT 3
Curricular,
Instructional,
Assessment, and
Organizational
Effectiveness
|
|
Member Name |
Position |
Chair |
|
Nadine Herrington |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Marilyn Shaver |
Teacher |
|
|
Jeannie Baker |
Teacher |
|
|
Cassie Sanders |
Teaching Assistant |
|
|
Sandra McCullough |
Teacher |
|
|
Jennifer Wilsford |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Elizabeth May |
Teacher |
|
|
Vickie Edgmon |
Teaching Assistant |
|
|
Paulette Bledsoe |
Teacher |
|
|
Hank Calton |
Teacher |
|
|
Kelley Deason |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Doug Bassham |
Guidance Teacher |
|
|
Mary Roper |
Teacher |
|
|
Joshilyn Tucker |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Jim May |
Teacher |
|
|
Amanda Smith |
Teacher |
|
|
Tina Carlton |
Nurse |
|
|
Component 3 Subcommittee has met to
address critical components of the SIP and minutes are
on file. |
x YES |
NO |
|
|
|
Subcommittee 3 Chair Signature |
|
Subcommittee for
COMPONENT 4 Action
Plan Development |
|
Member Name |
Position |
Chair |
|
Carol Abernathy |
Librarian |
Yes |
|
Kristy Butler |
Teacher |
|
|
Terrance Cross |
Teacher |
|
|
Kim Rogers |
Teaching Assistant |
|
|
Mary Laster |
Secretary |
|
|
Sandra Grensberg |
Teaching Assistant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component 4 Subcommittee has met to
address critical components of the SIP and minutes are
on file. |
x YES |
NO |
|
|
|
Subcommittee 4 Chair Signature |
|
Subcommittee for
COMPONENT 5 The
School Improvement Plan and Process Evaluation |
|
Member Name |
Position |
Chair |
|
Rita McDonald |
Teacher |
Yes |
|
Teri Mize |
Teacher |
|
|
Connie Walls |
Teacher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component 5 Subcommittee has met to
address critical components of the SIP and minutes are
on file. |
x YES |
NO |
|
|
Subcommittee 5 Chair Signature |
Component 1a – School Profile and Collaborative Process
1.3 Collection of Academic and Nonacademic Data and
Analysis/Synthesis
1.3.1: Data Sources
| Data Source |
Relevant Findings |
| TCAP Reports from
2004-2005,
2005-2006,
2006-2007 |
Used for information
about student academic performance, strengths, and needs |
| Elkton School Report
Card |
Used for findings
about students, demographics, and other assorted data
used throughout the report |
| TVAAS Reports |
Used for information
about specific strengths and needs of Elkton students |
| Algebra Gateway Test
Report |
Used for information
about Honors Algebra students |
| Think Link Learning/
Predictive Assessment Series (PAS) |
Used for information
about student academic progress, with testing being
administered three times per year. |
| DIBELS Assessment |
Used to assess
kindergarten students |
| Elkton School Honor
Roll |
Used to gain
information about student success |
| Surveys of students
|
Used to gain
information about students and their views of the
school; all surveys on hand for review |
| Surveys of teachers |
Used to gain a wealth
of information about teachers including demographics and
teaching practices |
| Surveys and
formal/informal interviews of parents, and community
members |
Used to gain
demographic information about parents and community
members; all surveys on file |
| Past Elkton School
SIPs |
Used to gather
historic data about the school |
1.3.2: School and Community Data
Narrative and analysis of relevant school and community data and
factors
SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS
Historical Background
Elkton School has a long history with many changes occurring as
it has adapted to the needs of the Elkton community. School students
first began meeting in 1810 in a log church. This location was later
replaced by a large two-story building. Here students were taught
simple reading, writing, arithmetic, and spelling. The Bible was
often taught as well because many of the teachers were the preachers
of the town.
By 1855, school was being held in a two-room building located in
the yard of the old Grigsby home. In 1870, the school was moved into
the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. Several years later, a one-room
school was erected facing Baugh Road on the present school campus.
This building was destroyed by a tornado in 1885, and a two-room
building was constructed on a two-acre lot. Rooms and teachers were
added as needed, and, in 1912, it became officially know as Elkton
High School. In 1939, a new brick school building was erected which
had six classrooms, a large auditorium, a music room, and a
cloakroom. Again rooms were needed, and, by 1946, a new gym and
elementary building had been added.
On August 6, 1972, fire destroyed most of the high school,
leaving only the lower section, which contained the cafeteria and a
few classrooms, and the upper section, which housed the agriculture
shop and the gymnasium. School was held in portable classrooms for
the next five years. After county-wide school consolidation, a new
school was built to serve students in grades K through eight,
opening in 1978.
Further construction was experienced in 1989. At this time, three
new classrooms were added, enabling the science laboratory and music
room to be used for their original purposes. The construction also
allowed for additional special education classrooms.
A new wing was added to the school facility and opened in August
2003. The wing provided approximately 5500 square feet of new
classroom space. This latest addition includes three classrooms, an
art/activity room, a music room, a band room, student restrooms, and
storage spaces.
Facilities
The present facilities of Elkton School include twenty-four
classrooms and a variety of other areas. Eighteen classrooms are
used as classes for grades kindergarten through eight. Other
classrooms and areas are used for two special education classes, a
Title I reading class, a Title I math class, speech therapy,
guidance, and a school health clinic. Other facilities used to
enhance students’ academic experiences include the library, a pre-K
classroom, a music room, a band room, a cafeteria and kitchen, and a
gymnasium with basketball courts and a stage area.
In January 2007, one classroom was used in which to install a new
computer lab. This lab consists of one teacher workstation connected
to an overhead-mounted projector and twenty-four student stations.
Each computer is connected to a school server and has Internet
access.
The administrative offices include a reception area, the
principal’s office, the bookkeeper’s office, a secured area for
students’ records, and two conference rooms. Two teacher work areas
are available, one on each of the two floors of the school. The
building houses eighteen student restroom facilities and two teacher
restroom facilities located in the upstairs work area. An intercom
system and surveillance equipment are located in the hallways and at
the entrance areas.
The outside campus offers tow playground areas including a track,
a paved area with basketball goals, climbing equipment, and other
playground equipment. An outside storage building is available as
well. Two paved parking areas are available for teacher and visitor
parking.
Environmental and Safety Concerns
Having a safe and secure environment for Elkton student s is a
top priority of the school staff and parents. The building has a
security system with shock and motion sensors. Cameras film
entrances and exits of the building and all hallways twenty-four
hours each day. All exterior doors, with the exception of the main
office door, are locked from the outside at all times. All doors can
be exited at any time. Visitors must enter through the office to
sign in and notify the office staff of their presence in the
building.
Emergency management personnel from various local agencies
regularly conduct school safety inspections. These teams prepare
official reports with recommendations to enhance school safety. As a
result of some of the reports, extra fire extinguishers have been
placed in recommended locations, ten communication devices have been
purchased, and changes have been made in protocol regarding fire
drill procedures. Drills are held regularly for fire and weather
emergencies.
Grade Distribution
|
Grade |
Number of Students |
|
Pre-K |
13 |
|
Kindergarten |
23 |
|
First |
35 |
|
Second |
39 |
|
Third |
41 |
|
Fourth |
46 |
|
Fifth |
29 |
|
Sixth |
32 |
|
Seventh |
40 |
|
Eighth |
40 |
|
Total |
338 |
Length of the School Year and Length of the School Day
Each school year consists of 180 days for students to be present
as mandated by the State of Tennessee. The length of the student day
is seven hours.
Operating Budget Distribution Equity
Using the plan for expenditures of instructional funds as
directed by the Giles County School System and the Tennessee
Department of Education, Elkton School distributes funds to several
departments within the school. A minimum of $3.00 per student in
grades K-3 and $2.00 per student in grades 4-12 must be spent in
each of two areas: (1) library resources and (2) instructional
materials/supplies. For each teacher, $200.00 is included in these
funds. All funds are budgeted by the school’s Instructional Planning
Committee. From county funds, there was $6,085.50 available for
these departments during the 2006-2007 school year. During the
2007-2008 school year, county funds of $5,828.00 were made available
to the school. The total funds allocated from all sources for
2007-2008 was $14,294.00. The principal, together with the
Instructional Planning Committee, determine the distribution of the
funds to different instructional areas.
For the 2007-2008 school year, the following distributions were
made:
K-3 4-8
Library Resources $ 904.50 $1,201.50
Instructional Materials/Supplies $1,466.24 $1,943.76
Health $ 134.00 $ 178.00
_____________________________
Total Funds Budgeted $5,828.00
Teacher Accounts (available at Central Office) $5,200.00
Fee Allocation $2,370.00
_____________________________
Total $7,570.00
Discretionary Funds 896.00
_____________________________
Total funds Allocated From All Sources $14,294.00
Per Pupil Expenditures
In referring to the Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE)
Report Card for Giles County for 2007, the per pupil expenditures
per average daily attendance (ADA) was $7740.00 within the county.
This money was funded locally by 34.7%, was funded at the state
level by 54.6, and at the federal level at 10.6%.
At the school level, pupil expenditures are about $43.00.
Administration, Faculty, and Staff Demographics including Years
of Experience
| Grade/subject
Assigned at
Elkton during
2007-2008 |
Educator |
Highest
Degree
Earned/
University |
Highly Qualified |
Total Years
Teaching |
Total Years
At
Elkton |
| Principal |
Bobby Polly |
M.Ed./MTSU |
|
37 |
30 |
| Pre-K- all subjects |
Paulette Bledsoe |
B.S./ MMC |
yes |
2 |
2 |
| Kindergarten- all
subjects |
Joshilyn Tucker |
B.S./ Athens State |
yes |
32 |
27 |
| Kindergarten- all
subjects |
Nikki Riddle |
B.S./ MMC |
yes |
7 |
7 |
| First Grade- all
subjects |
Claudia Davis |
M.Ed./ MTSU |
yes |
32 |
28 |
| First Grade- all
subjects |
Pam Scott |
M.Ed./
Cumberland U. |
yes |
17 |
17 |
| Second Grade- all
subjects |
Marilyn Shaver |
M.Ed./
U. of Louisville |
yes |
24 |
17 |
| Second Grade- all
subjects |
Elizabeth May |
M.E./ MTSU |
yes |
24 |
21 |
| Third Grade- all
subjects |
Kristy Butler |
B.S./ Lipscomb |
yes |
35 |
35 |
| Third Grade- all
subjects |
Jennifer Wilsford |
M.Ed./
Cumberland U. |
yes |
10 |
10 |
| Fourth Grade- all
subjects |
Rita McDonald |
Ed.S./ MTSU |
yes |
27 |
26 |
| Fourth Grade- all
subjects |
Amanda Smith |
M.Ed./ MTSU |
yes |
8 |
8 |
| Fifth Grade- all
subjects |
Kelley Deason |
Ed.S./ MTSU |
yes |
16 |
16 |
| Fifth Grade- all
subjects |
Angela Mayes |
M.Ed.+45/ MTSU |
yes |
16 |
16 |
| Sixth Grade-
language arts;
social studies |
Jim May |
M.Ed./ MTSU |
yes |
31 |
20 |
| Sixth Grade-
science; math;
social studies |
Connie Walls |
Ed.S./ MTSU |
yes |
15 |
15 |
| Seventh- and
Eighth-Grade-
science;
reading |
Nadine Herrington |
M.Ed./ Trevecca |
yes |
35 |
33.5 |
| Seventh- and
Eighth-Grade-
language arts
|
Teri Mize |
Ed. S./ MTSU |
yes |
15 |
15 |
| Seventh- and
Eighth-Grade-
math; algebra;
reading |
Brent Newton |
M.Ed./ TSU |
yes |
20 |
19 |
| Seventh- and
Eighth-Grade-
social studies;
reading |
Terrance Cross |
M.Ed./
Cumberland U. |
yes |
10 |
10 |
| K - Eighth-
Physical
Education |
Ricky Rose |
M.Ed./ TSU |
yes |
27 |
25 |
| K – Eighth-
Librarian |
Carol Abernathy |
M.Ed./ Trevecca |
yes |
26 |
24 |
| K – Eighth- Music |
Susan Holley |
M.Ed./ UNA |
yes |
25 |
22 |
| K – Eighth-
Guidance |
Doug Bassham |
M.A.+30/ UNA,MTSU |
yes |
18 |
4 |
| K – Fourth- Special
Education |
Jeannie Baker |
M.Ed./ Trevecca |
yes |
21.5 |
1 |
| Fifth-Eighth –
Special
Education |
Mary Roper |
B.S./ |
yes |
4 |
1 |
| Title I Reading |
Sharon Newman |
M.Ed./
Cumberland U. |
yes |
26 |
26 |
| Title I Math |
Hank Calton |
B.S./ MTSU |
yes |
28 |
8 |
| K – First Teaching
Assistant |
Vickie Edgmon |
H.S. |
yes |
9 |
9 |
| Second – Third
Teaching
Assistant |
Kim Rogers |
A.A./ |
yes |
2 |
2 |
| Special Education
Assistant |
Cassie Sanders |
H.S. |
yes |
5 |
5 |
| Special Education
Assistant |
Mary Jane Gentry |
A.A./ |
yes |
3 |
3 |
| One-on-One
Assistant |
Sandra Grensberg |
A.A./ MMC |
yes |
4 |
4 |
| Pre-K Assistant |
Tammy Gaudette |
H.S. |
yes |
4 |
2 |
| Registered Nurse |
Tina Carlton |
A.D.Nursing/ |
yes |
17 |
4 |
| Secretary/
Bookkeeper |
Mary Laster |
A.S./ Calhoun CC |
--- |
--- |
11 |
| Secretary/ Library
Assistant |
Melody Putman |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
10 |
| Custodian |
Brenda Mitchell |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
8 |
| Custodian |
Trudy Moore |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
2 |
| Part-time Custodian |
Bobby Butler |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
1 |
| Cafeteria Manager |
Sheila Gordon |
H.S. |
--- |
4 |
3 |
| Cafeteria
Worker |
Barbara Butler |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
8 |
| Cafeteria
Worker |
Becky Watson |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
3 |
| Part-time Cafeteria
worker |
Buford Gardner |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
1 |
| Part-time Cafeteria
worker |
Renee Bellefant |
H.S. |
--- |
--- |
1 |
Elkton Elementary School employs 45 faculty and staff members.
Percentage of Courses Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
All teachers meet the standards of federal regulations for being
considered “highly qualified.” Therefore, 100% of all courses are
taught by highly qualified teachers.
Percentage of Faculty Teaching Courses Outside Their Area of
Certification
No teacher is teaching outside of his or her area of
certification. Therefore, the percentage of teachers teaching
outside of their area of certification is 0%.
Enrollment Data
Total enrollment for the 2007-2008 school year is 338 students.
Curriculum Offerings
A full curriculum is taught at Elkton School. Students in grades
K-2 and grades 4-5 are self-contained classes, covering the subjects
of English, reading, spelling, math, science, and social studies.
Students in grades 3 and 6-8 exchange classes for those same
subjects. Special area teachers are responsible for instruction in
library skills, guidance, computer skills and technology, and
physical education. All grade-level teachers are responsible for art
instruction.
For eighth-grade students, an Honors Algebra I class is offered
to eligible students.
Unique Programs
Students in first-, second-, and third-grade take part in a
program called “Second Step.” It is led by a trained social service
worker and lasts for one semester. The program continues in the
fourth- and fifth-grades as “Conflict Resolution.” Students in the
fifth grade participate in the D.A.R.E. program designed to promote
abstinence from the use of drugs and alcohol. A county sheriff’s
deputy staffs this twelve-week program. Third-grade students
participate in the Tennessee Nutrition and Consumer Education
Program (TNCEP) through the UT Agriculture and Extension Service.
Beginning in the 2006-2007 school year, a school-wide sustained
silent reading (SSR) program was implemented.
Honors Classes
For eligible eighth-grade students, an Honor Algebra I class is
offered.
Advanced Placement Classes
Algebra I for eligible students is the only Advanced Placement
class offered at Elkton. Students must pass the Gateway Exam during
the last six-weeks to receive a high school credit.
Parental Support
Parental involvement is very important to the overall success of
the school. Some of the services parents provide include serving as
room parents, volunteering during book fairs, organizing the
yearbook, serving as trip chaperones, assisting in field day,
organizing numerous Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO) events,
sponsoring an annual talent show, and helping teachers with a
variety of classroom projects.
Drug, Alcohol, or Tobacco Incidents or Arrests
During 2006-2007, there was one alcohol-related incident.
School-Business Partnerships
Community support for Elkton School is also essential to the
success enjoyed by the school. Funding assistance through the
Adopt-a-School program has supported monetary awards for student
achievement in programs such as the science fair, the spelling bee,
and essay contest. Community members and local business people serve
as judges for many of the student activities. Local banks award
savings bonds and other monetary awards to honor roll students and
eighth-grade students with the highest grade point averages. In the
last school year, over one hundred local and county businesses made
donations to support activities of Elkton School. During the
2006-2007 school year, two community churches encouraged reading
literacy among the student body by purchasing books at each of the
school’s two book fairs for students who would have otherwise been
financially unable to purchase a book.
Mobility and Longevity of Staff at the School
Teachers at Elkton Elementary are very committed to the school
and the community. More than half of the teachers have taught at
Elkton School for more than fifteen (15) years. The average of the
total years experience is 21 years.
Grant Awards
During the most recent years, no faculty members of Elkton School
have applied for any grants.
Highly Qualified Paraprofessionals
Elkton School paraprofessionals are all “highly qualified,”
according to NCLB requirements. All paraprofessionals have passed
the necessary exams and/or have at least an Associate’s Degree.
Trained and Qualified Mentors
While no teachers have been trained officially as mentors, each
new teacher is assigned to work with an experienced teacher. The two
teachers often teach the same grade level together. This does give
the new teacher a qualified mentor with whom to work.
STUDENT POPULATION DATA
Number of Students
There are 338 students enrolled for the 2007-2008 school year.
English Proficiency
During 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, Elkton students have been 100%
English proficient.
Free and Reduced Lunch Rate (Economically Disadvantaged)
For the 2007-2008 school year, 241 of the 338 students
participate in the Free and Reduced Lunch Program. The free and
reduced lunch rate is 71%.
Discipline Referrals
Using information from the 2006-2007 state report card, there
were six students suspended. Of the six suspended, five were males
(2.8%), one was female (0.6%), five were white (1.6%), and one was
black (3.1%).
Retention Rate
In May 2007, 98.9% of all students were promoted.
Transfer Rate (Mobility)
For the 2006-2007 school year, Elkton School ended the year with
322 students. Throughout the year, 355 students were enrolled, with
the difference being 33 students.
Drop-Out Rate and Graduation Rate
For Giles County High School, the 2007 graduation rate was 76.5%.
The cohort dropout rate was 12.7%. The event dropout rate was 2.5%
Special Education Disability Types, Numbers, and Percents
In this category, there are 50 students identified in the special
education program, with 7 students in Quest/Gifted, 10 students
receiving services for speech and other students with language
impairments, functionally delayed, and autism.
Students Attending Preschool
Of students in the 2007-2008 kindergarten class, 12 of 23
attended a pre-school program.
Extracurricular Activities
Extracurricular activities are available to students who are
interested and meet the academic and conduct requirements. Sports
programs offered to sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students
include the South Giles Eagles football team, made up of students
from both Elkton and Minor Hill School, and the South Giles Eagles
soccer team, made up of girls from both schools. The sports program
also offers both a boys’ and girls’ basketball team, the Elks and
Lady Elks, and the Elkton cheerleading squad.
Academic opportunities offered to students include the Scholastic
Bowl team, for seventh- and eighth-graders, and the Beta Club,
Student Council, and Fellowship of Christian Athletes for those in
grades six through eight. Students in grades three through eight can
enter the school Spelling Bee with winners advancing to the
county-wide competition. Seventh- and eighth-grade county Spelling
Bee winners advance to a statewide contest.
Regular 4-H meetings are held at the school, with all fourth- and
fifth-grade students joining the organization. Sixth-, seventh-, and
eighth-grade students may also join 4-H and participate in the
meetings at the school.
Student Attitudes/ Perceptual Data
From past survey and interviews, students feel safe at Elkton
School. For the most part, the students have positive attitudes
toward their school and the activities in which they are engaged
while there. They feel as if they could receive help from most any
teacher.
PARENT OR GUARDIAN DEMOGRAPHICS
Race, Ethnicity, Marital Status, Level of Education, Employment
Status, and Income Level
Parents and guardians were asked to complete a survey concerning
demographic information. The amount of surveys returned was very
good. The following information was gathered: 79% are married; 21%
are single; 14% have some high school but no diploma; 35% have a
high school diploma or GED; 20% have some college; 26% have a
college degree; and 6% have advanced college degrees.
COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS
Elkton is a small community out from Pulaski, Tennessee. The
economic level is low, and there are no major employers in the area.
There are no private schools, group homes, or homeless shelter in
the Elkton area.
Component 1b – Academic and Non-Academic Data Analysis/Synthesis
The latest SIP for Elkton School was revised and developed in May
2007. This was done in order to coordinate with a five-year review
for the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). Since
that time, the SIP has often been reviewed and referred to by the
Elkton faculty and staff. Many other school-level reports and
documents are used by the faculty. Academic and non-academic data
sources are reviewed regularly by the faculty and school
administration. Those sources are listed in section 1.4.
The collected data and an analysis of that data are given in
section 1.5. Information concerning disaggregated data is given in
section 1.6. A synthesis of all data is given in section 1.7.
Prioritized goal targets are listed in section 1.8.
In assessing the academic and non-academic needs of Elkton
School, many sources of data were utilized. These sources were used
to conduct careful examination and further interpretation of student
events. Extracted data from these sources is presented in this
component. Included in the inquiry were the sources listed below:
1.4: Variety of Academic and Non-Academic Assessment Measures
|
List Data Sources
|
| TCAP
Reports from 2004-2005, 2005-2006, 2006-2007 |
| Elkton
School Report Cards |
| 2007 TVAAS
School Report for Elkton Elementary in Giles County:
TCAP CRT for Reading/Language, Math, Social Studies,
and Science
|
| TCAP
Writing Assessment Results |
| Algebra
Gateway Test Results |
| Think
Link/PAS Test Information for Grades 2 through 8 |
| DIBELS
Assessment for Kindergarten |
| Elkton
Elementary School Honor Roll for Grades 1 through 8 |
|
Observations and surveys and assorted information from
various committees and stakeholders |
1.5: Data Collection and Analysis
Describe the data collection and analysis process used in
determining your strengths and needs.
ACADEMIC DATA AND ANALYSIS
TCAP Tests
Students in the Giles County School System participate in the
achievement assessment program as prescribed by the State of
Tennessee Department of Education. Even though the TCAP test is not
required by the State of Tennessee for grades K-2, the Giles County
Board of Education has for many years required TCAP testing for all
students in grades K-8. Beginning in 2006-2007, the decision was
made that kindergarten students would not be tested using the TCAP
test but would instead use the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early
Literacy Skills (DIBELS) for assessment purposes.
Because K-2 testing is not required, little information
concerning test scores is available for K-2 students. As a result,
teachers at Elkton School have always studied the reports provided
to them to help draw conclusions and prepare for the next school
year. On the TCAP report entitled “Objectives Performance Summary,”
the percent of students mastering tested objectives can be useful
information
schoolwide. To help put the information into a more concise and
useable form,
charts have been developed. To arrive at a score for
reading/language, all subtests concerning those subjects have been
averaged. The same has been done to calculate scores for math,
social studies and science. This type of calculation gives a
comparison across all grade levels.
Percent of Students Mastering Reading/Language
(Advanced or Proficient)
| |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
1st grade |
78% |
49% |
77% |
|
2nd grade |
89% |
75% |
54% |
|
3rd grade |
97% |
96% |
98% |
|
4th grade |
84% |
94% |
94% |
|
5th grade |
89% |
100% |
100% |
|
6th grade |
94% |
86% |
97% |
|
7th grade |
79% |
83% |
84% |
|
8th grade |
89% |
92% |
91% |
(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging
percentages of mastery in all subtests for reading, language,
vocabulary, word analysis, language mechanics, and spelling.)
Percent of Students Mastering Math
(Advanced or Proficient)
| |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
K |
58% |
73% |
-- |
|
1st grade |
63% |
45% |
61% |
|
2nd grade |
69% |
67% |
47% |
|
3rd grade |
90% |
92% |
92% |
|
4th grade |
84% |
83% |
93% |
|
5th grade |
84% |
95% |
96% |
|
6th grade |
95% |
91% |
90% |
|
7th grade |
87% |
86% |
81% |
|
8th grade |
85% |
78% |
83% |
(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging
percentages of mastery in all subtests for mathematics and math
computation.)
Percent of Students Mastering Social Studies
(Advanced or Proficient)
| |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
K |
|
|
|
|
1st grade |
79% |
63% |
80% |
|
2nd grade |
91% |
79% |
60% |
|
3rd grade |
83% |
89% |
93% |
|
4th grade |
79% |
84% |
88% |
|
5th grade |
72% |
83% |
96% |
|
6th grade |
87% |
86% |
87% |
|
7th grade |
60% |
70% |
73% |
|
8th grade |
74% |
69% |
62% |
(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging
percentages of mastery in all subtests for social studies.)
Percent of Students Mastering Science
(Advanced or Proficient)
| |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
K |
|
|
|
|
1st grade |
62% |
43% |
57% |
|
2nd grade |
74% |
69% |
52% |
|
3rd grade |
93% |
92% |
85% |
|
4th grade |
84% |
89% |
88% |
|
5th grade |
69% |
87% |
84% |
|
6th grade |
92% |
84% |
98% |
|
7th grade |
67% |
67% |
66% |
|
8th grade |
72% |
66% |
70% |
(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging
percentages of mastery in all subtests for science.)
By using this type of calculation, there is evidence of grades 3,
4, and 5 maintaining or increasing mastery in reading/language arts,
math, and social studies. Grade 1 improved in all subject areas, but
grade 2 declined in every subject area. Students in grade 6 improved
in all areas with the exception of math. For grades 7 and 8, scores
remained steady in reading/language arts and social studies but
declined slightly in math and science.
In addition to the mastery information, teachers also study
the TCAP report entitled “Performance Level Summary Report.” This
report has been available in its present form for only two school
years and is available for grades 3-8. From this report, information
can be gathered concerning the percent of students in each
performance level of advanced, proficient, and below proficient.
Performance Levels for Reading/Language Arts
| |
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
3rd grade |
Advanced |
47% |
46% |
47% |
| |
Proficient |
50% |
50% |
51% |
| |
Below proficient |
3% |
4% |
2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
4th grade |
Advanced |
26% |
36% |
50% |
| |
Proficient |
58% |
58% |
44% |
| |
Below proficient |
16% |
6% |
6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5th grade |
Advanced |
33% |
44% |
52% |
| |
Proficient |
56% |
56% |
48% |
| |
Below proficient |
11% |
0% |
0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
6th grade |
Advanced |
32% |
39% |
40% |
| |
Proficient |
62% |
47% |
57% |
| |
Below proficient |
5% |
14% |
2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
7th grade |
Advanced |
22% |
33% |
37% |
| |
Proficient |
57% |
50% |
47% |
| |
Below proficient |
22% |
17% |
16% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8th grade |
Advanced |
32% |
41% |
44% |
| |
Proficient |
57% |
51% |
47% |
| |
Below proficient |
11% |
7% |
9% |
Performance Levels for Math
| |
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
3rd grade |
Advanced |
50% |
50% |
49% |
| |
Proficient |
40% |
42% |
43% |
| |
Below proficient |
10% |
8% |
9% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
4th grade |
Advanced |
26% |
19% |
34% |
| |
Proficient |
58% |
64% |
59% |
| |
Below proficient |
16% |
17% |
6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5th grade |
Advanced |
28% |
41% |
36% |
| |
Proficient |
56% |
54% |
60% |
| |
Below proficient |
17% |
5% |
4% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
6th grade |
Advanced |
38% |
47% |
33% |
| |
Proficient |
57% |
44% |
57% |
| |
Below proficient |
5% |
8% |
10% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
7th grade |
Advanced |
38% |
25% |
34% |
| |
Proficient |
49% |
61% |
47% |
| |
Below proficient |
14% |
14% |
18% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8th grade |
Advanced |
32% |
32% |
21% |
| |
Proficient |
53% |
46% |
62% |
|
Below proficient |
15% |
22% |
18% |
Performance Levels for Social Studies
| |
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
3rd grade |
Advanced |
30% |
35% |
38% |
| |
Proficient |
53% |
54% |
47% |
| |
Below proficient |
17% |
12% |
15% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
4th grade |
Advanced |
10% |
28% |
47% |
| |
Proficient |
69% |
56% |
43% |
| |
Below proficient |
21% |
17% |
13% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5th grade |
Advanced |
14% |
21% |
24% |
| |
Proficient |
58% |
62% |
72% |
| |
Below proficient |
28% |
18% |
4% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
6th grade |
Advanced |
11% |
17% |
24% |
| |
Proficient |
76% |
69% |
63% |
| |
Below proficient |
14% |
14% |
12% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
7th grade |
Advanced |
14% |
14% |
18% |
| |
Proficient |
46% |
56% |
55% |
| |
Below proficient |
41% |
31% |
26% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8th grade |
Advanced |
23% |
20% |
18% |
| |
Proficient |
51% |
49% |
44% |
| |
Below proficient |
26% |
32% |
38% |
Performance Levels for Science
| |
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|
3rd grade |
Advanced |
13% |
42% |
38% |
| |
Proficient |
80% |
50% |
55% |
| |
Below proficient |
7% |
8% |
6% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
4th grade |
Advanced |
24% |
28% |
44% |
| |
Proficient |
60% |
61% |
44% |
| |
Below proficient |
17% |
11% |
13% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5th grade |
Advanced |
11% |
18% |
24% |
| |
Proficient |
58% |
69% |
60% |
| |
Below proficient |
31% |
13% |
16% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
6th grade |
Advanced |
24% |
17% |
32% |
| |
Proficient |
68% |
67% |
66% |
| |
Below proficient |
8% |
17% |
2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
7th grade |
Advanced |
8% |
14% |
24% |
| |
Proficient |
59% |
53% |
42% |
| |
Below proficient |
32% |
33% |
34% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8th grade |
Advanced |
19% |
7% |
26% |
| |
Proficient |
53% |
59% |
44% |
| |
Below proficient |
28% |
34% |
29% |
Many observations can be made by reviewing the information
concerning performance levels and the percentages of advanced
students. In third grade, an increase in the number of advanced
students can be seen in the subject areas of reading/language arts
and social studies, while there is a slight decline in the number of
advanced students in math and science. The fourth grade percentages
maintained or increased in all subject areas except science. The
fifth grade shows an increase in the number of advanced students in
every subject area except math. The sixth grade remained steady or
increased in every area with the exception of math. The seventh
grade showed an increase in reading/language arts and social studies
but showed a decrease in math and science. The eighth grade had a
higher percentage of advanced students in math and science but a
decreased number in reading/language arts and social studies.
Using this information, all grade levels showed an increase in
the number of advanced students in reading/language arts. For math,
grades four, five, and eight showed increases while grades three,
six, and seven indicated slight decreases in advanced performance.
In social studies, the number of advanced students in grades three
through seven increased, but there was a 2% decline in the number of
eighth-grade students. For science, there was an increase in the
number of advanced students in grades four, five, six, seven, and
eight.
TCAP Criterion Referenced Academic Achievement
Elkton teachers and all stakeholders study the state’s school
report card to look for trends in strengths and areas of need. Using
information given concerning criterion referenced academic
achievement for three years, 2005, 2006, and 2007, several strengths
can be noted.
Elkton students have continually raised the school’s math,
reading/language arts, and social studies scores for each of the
three years. While science had remained steady for the two previous
years, students raised those scores in 2007.
Comparisons can be made using the state scores and grades. In
2005, Elkton was lower than the state scores in all subjects and the
same as the state grades with the exception of a lower grade in
reading/language. In 2006, students’ scores remained lower by one or
two points than the state scores in all subjects. However, Elkton’s
grades were on par with the state grades in every subject. In 2007,
students’ scores continued to be one or two points lower than the
state scores in all subject areas. In reading/language arts,
Elkton’s report card grade is on par with the state grade, but the
grades in math, science, and social studies remain one letter grade
lower than the state.
This comparison of scores does indicate some strengths of the
Elkton students. Even so, areas of concern still exist, especially
to raise Elkton scores to the state level.
TVAAS – Value Added
In studying available TVAAS data, the Elkton faculty pays
particular attention to gains and losses during the most recent
three years of time. Numbers are studied to discover trends.
In reading/language arts, grades four, five, and seven show gains
while grades six and eight show declines from 2006 to 2007. The
Elkton three-year average compares to the state’s three-year average
by grades five and eight being above the state average and grades
four, six, and seven being below the state average.
For math, TVAAS data from 2006-2007 indicates a gain for grades
four and five but a decline in scores at all other grade levels.
When comparing the three-year averages, the fifth and sixth grades
had averages above the state three-year average. All other grades
were below the state average.
The 2006-2007 TVAAS data for social studies indicates increased
scores for grades four, six, and seven with grades five and eight
having declines. The three-year averages were above the state
averages in grades five, six, and eight while grades four and seven
were below the state averages.
Science TVAAS data points to an increase in scores at all grade
levels except for grade five. Three-year averages are above the
state average in the sixth and eighth grades while grades four,
five, and seven are all below the state’s three-year average growth.
Kindergarten DIBELS Assessment Scores for
2006-2007
|
Assessment |
Beginning |
Middle |
End |
|
Initial Sound Fluency |
|
91% established
6% emerging
3% deficient |
|
|
Letter Naming Fluency |
|
80% low risk
6% some risk
14% at risk |
86% low risk
0% some risk
14% at risk |
|
Phoneme Segmentation Fluency |
|
86% low risk
9% some risk
6% at risk |
94% established
3% emerging
3% deficient |
|
Nonsense Word Fluency |
|
89% low risk
6% some risk
6% at risk |
91% low risk
3% some risk
6% at risk |
Elkton Elementary piloted Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early
Literacy Skills (DIBELS) as an assessment for 2006-2007 kindergarten
students. Due to the school districts late start, kindergarten
students were given two tests instead of three. Gains were noted in
all areas.
Component 2 – Beliefs, Common Mission, and Shared Vision
The Elkton School faculty and staff first began to develop a
set of belief statements and a mission statement during the first
steps towards SACS accreditation in 1990-1991. After that time, the
beliefs and mission have been reviewed yearly by the committee
assigned to that position. The committee then presents their
findings to the faculty, staff, students, parents, and other
stakeholders for approval and consensus.
During the 2001-2002 school year, the belief statements and
mission were modified and reworded as necessary by the faculty and
staff. Some new statements were added, and the mission statement was
revised in order to make it more student-friendly. The newly
reviewed beliefs and mission were mailed to a large membership group
of the parents and community members. They were asked to present
their findings in a work session at the school. That group presented
several new ideas that were incorporated into the final list of
beliefs and mission for that school year. One particularly memorable
statement came from a community member asking that patriotism be
addressed, especially because of the then-recent events of September
11, 2001. Consensus to accept that idea and all others was reached
by the parent/community group. A presentation of the work of that
group was given to the entire faculty and staff, at that time also
reaching consensus. The beliefs and mission were presented to the
entire student body. As a group, they made the mission statement a
part of all student gatherings. The student body is still, in 2006,
proud to show their involvement in the everyday presentation of the
mission statement.
When beginning the thought process to develop a vision statement,
all teachers and staff members were given information concerning the
basic ideas of the development of a vision statement. All teachers,
teaching assistants, secretaries, and custodians completed a form
giving their thoughts on a vision statement. All statements were
compiled and reviewed by the faculty and staff before presenting
some of the possible vision statements to other stakeholders. Five
favorite possibilities were presented to other stakeholders. From
that list, the present vision statement was chosen by the faculty
and staff. Later that statement was presented to students, parents,
and other community members for their input. From this process came
the present vision statement for Elkton School.
2.1: Beliefs, Common Mission, and Shared Vision
Beliefs
The Beliefs of Elkton Elementary School
1. Placed in the least restrictive environment and given an
education that meets their needs, all children can learn.
2. For optimal growth and learning, students need to be provided
with a safe learning environment that is emotionally and
intellectually stimulating.
3. School staff, parents, and the community must collaborate and
unite in order to provide maximum support for the learning
environment.
4. Relationships that foster mutual respect between students and
school staff will promote positive self-esteem and behavior.
5. Equipping students with problem solving and decision-making
skills will lead them to become independent learners and
contributing members of society.
6. High expectations and desire for quality work encourages
students to work to the best of their ability.
7. The use of research-based data-driven instructional methods
and assessments will maximize student achievement.
8. Continual reevaluation of programs, teaching methods, and uses
of assessments to plan an effective curriculum will better prepare
students for the future.
9. Through example and instruction, students will develop a
strong sense of character, citizenship, and patriotism.
Common Mission
The mission of Elkton Elementary School is to
provide a quality education so
all students may achieve yearly progress because
Effective
Learning
Kindles
Success.
Shared Vision
It is the vision of Elkton School to provide every student with a
quality experience that promotes community, respect, and
achievement. Students, teachers, parents, and community members work
together to enhance the opportunities that are available for all
students. Together, we can!
Component 3 – Curricular, Instructional, Assessment, and
Organizational Effectiveness
Template 3.1.a: Curricular Practices
(Rubric Indicators 3.1 and 3.2)
|
Current Curricular
Practices |
Use of the Tennessee Blueprint for
Learning |
Curriculum Mapping |
Established Benchmarks |
Literacy |
Technology |
Textbooks |
Formative Assessments |
|
Evidence of
Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) |
98% of the
teachers surveyed said they use the state-approved
curriculum |
78% of the
teachers surveyed said they use curriculum mapping |
92% of
teachers surveyed said that school and state benchmarks
can be met |
3-Tiered
Reading is beginning to be put in practice in the lower
grades; an assigned time for silent reading is part of
the school day for upper grades. |
A newly
equipped computer lab is in place. |
100% of the
students have necessary textbooks |
100% of
students in grades 2-8 take the Think Link/PAS test to
help practice testing skills. |
|
Is the
current practice research-based? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Is it a
principle & practice of high-performing schools? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Has the
current practice been effective or ineffective? |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
|
What data
source(s) do you have that support your answer?
(identify all applicable sources) |
School Report
Card |
School Report
Card; TCAP reports |
School Report
Card; AYP reports |
Teacher
observations; student grades |
Teacher
observations; records of computer lab use |
Teacher
observations; student report cards; TCAP reports |
Reports from
Think Link tests |
|
Evidence of
effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of
quantifiable improvement) |
Improved test
scores |
Improved test
scores |
The school’s
scores meet the benchmarks in all areas. |
With more of
an emphasis on reading, teachers are seeing improved
grades for most students. |
Using the
Study Island Assessment program, the computer lab is
effective in reinforcing academic skills. |
Teachers work
regularly to coordinate curriculum standards with
textbook information. |
Because the
Think Link tests help to show areas of need for each
student, teachers are able to specifically address those
needs. |
|
Evidence of
equitable school support for this practice |
All academic
classes make a real push toward the curriculum
standards. |
All teachers
have opportunities of common planning times to work with
other teachers on curriculum mapping. |
Teachers are
given copies of benchmark figures and the school’s
scores to see achievement levels. |
Teachers
reached consensus that a reading time must take place
everyday. |
All students
use the computer lab at least one hour each week. Every
teacher can use the lab during any of the open times. |
All students
have textbooks that are needed. |
All students
in grades 2-8 participate in the Think Link testing
program. |
|
Next Step
(changes or continuations) |
Continue this
process of studying the curriculum and sharing ideas to
adequately meet the needs of all students, especially
those in the lower proficiency areas. |
Continue and
expand on this process. As the curriculum is updated,
teachers should make necessary changes to accommodate
new curriculum standards. |
As the state
benchmarks are raised, teachers must be ever mindful of
curriculum requirements. |
Because the
3-tiered reading program is just beginning in lower
grades, it should be expanded there. Teachers should
then share ideas during professional development times
concerning reading instruction. |
Expand the
use of the computer lab. Teachers should better
coordinate academic needs with the computer instructor
for reinforcement in the computer lab. |
As new
textbooks are adopted, teachers must match curriculum
needs with resources available with textbooks. Teachers
must also continue to search for materials that
supplement textbooks. |
Teachers
should become more aware of the information available
from the Think Link reports. Ideas for using this
information should be shared among the faculty during
professional development times. |
|
Curriculum Gap
Analysis - Narrative
Response Required |
|
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And
OTHER RESOURCES
(How are we currently allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
curricular practices?)
·1 TIME –
Elkton School teachers consider the Tennessee
Curriculum standards as the basis for student
learning. All work is based on the SPIs. All
faculty and staff spend time ensuring that each
student is included in the general curriculum.
Curriculum mapping is evident in the classrooms.
Curriculum options and new resources that could
be beneficial to our students are discussed
during professional development activities.
Teachers are encouraged to use their planning
time as a means of communicating with teachers
and a means of curricular planning.
·2 MONEY
– The principal is the distributor of funds at
Elkton School; therefore, funds are used
cautiously but wisely. When monies are requested
by a teacher, a thorough investigation is
launched by the principal concerning the
long-term benefits to the curriculum. Each
department is given an allocated amount to
spend.
·3
PERSONNEL – The state standards are followed by
all personnel at Elkton School. Strong
curriculum support is evident by the strong
dedication from the educational assistants,
special education department, gifted
instructors, and new computer lab facilitator.
All of these have proven to provide extra help
and support for, not only students with
disabilities but all students, through their
dedication in implementing the curriculum.
·4 OTHER
RESOURCES – Elkton School relies heavily on its
community and its members as valuable sources to
the curriculum.
“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our:
TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES
(How should we be allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
curricular practices?)
·1 TIME –
Overall, the time for planning is spent wisely.
However, more grade-level planning in the upper
grades could prove beneficial.
·2 MONEY
– The Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO)
allocates $50.00 per teacher each semester for
instructional materials. The county allocates
$200.00 per teacher each year for instructional
materials.
·3
PERSONNEL – There is adequate personnel at
Elkton School. However, the school is in need of
an art teacher. Also, a full-time at-risk coach
would greatly help strengthen some weaker
curricular areas for some students.
·4 OTHER
RESOURCES – The faculty should continue to
explore new research-based curricular materials
and methods. The teachers should continue to
incorporate community and its resources into the
curriculum.
|
|
Equity and Adequacy: Are we providing equity and
adequacy to all of our teachers?
Yes. Teachers have ample planning time, sufficient
professional development, and good curriculum guides.
Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to
meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective
with all their students?
Yes. Funds and resources are used in a cautious but
wise manner.
Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the
needs of all students in our school?
Yes. Based on AYP and the school report card, the
school is doing an adequate job, but there is room for
improvement. |
Template 3.1.c: Curricular Summary Questions
(Rubric Indicator 3.2)
|
Curriculum Summary
Questions- Narrative
Response Required |
|
What are our major strengths and how do we know?
- The curriculum is taught by 100% highly qualified
teachers.
- The staff is stronger with the addition of a
computer lab facilitator.
- Teachers continue to evaluate test data and make
plans for improvements. |
|
Curriculum Summary
Questions- Narrative
Response Required |
|
What are our major challenges and how do we know.
(These should be stated as curricular practice
challenges identified in the templates above, that could
be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in
component 1.) - Additional professional
development could help teachers be more familiar with
the state curriculum and especially as it relates to
needs of students in the lower proficiency areas. |
|
Curriculum Summary
Questions- Narrative
Response Required |
|
How will we address our challenges?
-Work should be done to continue upgrades in
technology throughout the school to accommodate changes
in the curriculum and to meet the needs of the students.
- Curriculum mapping should be expanded vertically
and horizontally. |
Template 3.2.a: Instructional Practices
(Rubric Indicators 3.3 and 3.4)
|
Current
Instructional Practices |
Differentiated
Instruction |
Supplemental
Instructional
Programs |
Use of
Technology |
School and
Community-wide
Activities |
Continuous
Re-evaluation
And modification
Of instructional
programs |
Classroom
Organization/
Knowledge
Application |
Additional Classroom Materials to
Supplement Adopted Textbooks |
|
Evidence of
Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) |
Use of the
following: language tracking folders; lectures; Power
Point; audio lessons; video lessons; hands-on
activities/experiments; cross-curricular instruction;
cooperative learning; projects; skills using library
books; manipulatives; multiple intelligence activities
|
Use of the
following: OT/ PT/Speech/ language instruction; Title
I Reading and Math;
At-Risk instructor; tutoring programs; QUEST;
Pre-K; field trips; food cart; Ag-in-the-
Classroom; computer instruction; teaching assistants;
AR used to reinforce teaching |
Use of the
following: Power Point; calculators; audio/vide/
CD/laser discs presentations; United Streaming; computer
classes |
Participation
in the following: school spelling bee; school-wide
science fair; scholastic bowl; essay, poetry, and art
contests; Volksmarch; class assembly programs,
school-wide assembly programs |
Use of the
following: curriculum mapping; Tennessee Blueprint
for Learning; teacher collaboration. Use of Think
Link and DIBELS reports to reevaluate and change
instructional programs. |
Participation
in the following: Silent Sustained Reading (SSR); peer
tutoring; shared reading; conferences with students;
one-on-one instruction; small-group instruction |
Most teachers
surveyed and observed use additional materials to
supplement adopted textbooks. |
|
Is the
current practice research-based? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Is it a
principle & practice of high-performing schools? |
Yes; listed
in “Schools to Watch |
Yes; listed
in “Schools to Watch” |
Yes; listed
in “Schools to Watch” |
Yes; listed
in “Schools to Watch” |
Yes; listed
in
“Schools to Watch” |
Yes; listed
in “Schools to Watch” |
Yes |
|
Has the
current practice been effective or ineffective?
|
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
|
What data
source(s) do you have that support your answer?
(identify all applicable sources) |
Reports from
TCAP, Think Link, Gateway, DIBELS, surveys |
Reports from
TCAP, Think Link, Gateway, DIBELS, surveys |
Reports from
TCAP, Think Lind, Gateway, DIBELS, surveys |
Participation
numbers of the amount of student involvement
|
Reports from
TCAP, Think Link, DIBELS, Gateway, and surveys |
Reports from
TCAP, Think Link, DIBELS, and Gateway |
Teacher
observations and interviews |
|
Evidence of
effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of
quantifiable improvement) |
Surveys show
that 91% of the faculty feels students are provided with
multiple opportunities to succeed. In 2005, 2006, and
2007, 100% of algebra students passed the Algebra
Gateway. |
Surveys show
that 80% of faculty feels they have the proper support
from administration and staff members. In 2005, 2006,
and 2007, 100% of algebra students passed the Algebra
Gateway. |
Surveys show
that 65% of the faculty feel students are highly engaged
in technology activities. In 2005, 2006, 2007, 100% of
algebra students passed the Algebra Gateway. |
100%
participation in class assembly programs and school-wide
assembly programs. Spelling bees held in every 3-5
classroom to determine representatives in the school
spelling bee where 48 students represented grades 3-8.
Science Fair participation required in grades 4-8; other
grades chose to participate, with 100% participating in
’06-’07. In the Scholastic Bowl, 10 students from grades
7-8 represent the school. Students in grades 7-8 submit
poetry, submit essays for Farm Bureau, Elkton Historical
Society, and VFW, and participate in the Elkton
Volksmarch. |
Surveys show
78% of teachers use curriculum mapping, 100% use
Tennessee Blueprint, and 96% feel teaching and
learning materials are correlated to state standards and
distributed to the instructional staff. In 2005, 2006,
and 2007, 100% of algebra
students passed the Algebra Gateway.
|
In 2005,
2006, and 2007, 100% of algebra students passed the
Algebra Gateway. |
Improved
student grades often result from the use of additional
materials be used supplement the adopted textbooks. |
|
Evidence of
equitable school support for this practice |
In-service
has been conducted on interpreting and using TCAP
scores, using Think Link results, using United
Streaming, and high-performing schools. |
All students
in K-8 have access to these programs, as appropriate for
need or age. In-service has been provided on some
programs, such as TNCEP. |
In-service
has been offered on the use of Power Point and United
Streaming. All teachers have at least one working
computer in their classroom. All teachers and students
have access to the computer lab. |
School-wide
opportunities and participation in community activities |
All teachers
have a copy of the Tennessee Blueprint, a daily
planning time, and access to TCAP, Think Link, and
DIBELS scores. |
SSR is a
school-wide activity. All teachers are willing to help
students one-on-one or offer peer tutoring. Teachers
often conference with students. |
All teachers
have available funding for purchase of supplemental
materials. Supplies are available in the school to make
supplemental material. |
|
Next Step
(changes or continuations) |
Continue the
use of differentiated instruction. Request in-service on
addressing and meeting the needs of multiple
intelligences in the classroom. |
Continue the
use to the supplemental programs. Continue to find more
opportunities to use supplemental instruction. |
Expand the
use of technology. Encourage all teachers to utilize
available technology. |
Continue
present activities. Encourage more student participation
in school-sponsored activities. |
Continue the
present reevaluation and modification of programs.
Encourage more teachers to implement the use of Think
Link or DIBELS results to evaluate instruction. |
Continue the
present activities. Encourage teachers not fully using
these programs To implement them into their
instruction. |
As new
textbooks are adopted, teachers must study and share
with each other ideas concerning supplemental material. |
Template 3.2.b: Instructional Gap Analysis
|
Instructional Gap
Analysis - Narrative
Response Required |
|
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And
OTHER RESOURCES
(How are we currently allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
instructional practices?)
·5 TIME –
Time has been allocated for planned in-service
activities.
·6 MONEY
– Instructional money is allocated from the
Central Office, the budget is made for the money
to be used by the school, and the Instructional
Budget Committee of Elkton School reviews and
approves the budget.
·7
PERSONNEL – All teachers are “highly qualified”
using the guidelines of NCLB. Elkton School has
two teachers per grade level to serve students
and maintain student/teacher ratio below the
state average. There are four full-time teachers
for library, music, guidance, and physical
education. There are two full-time assistants
who serve grades K-1 and grades 2-3.
·8 OTHER
RESOURCES – One community volunteer assists one
day each week, especially for grades 4-8. Other
resources providing instructional services for
the school are parent volunteers, members of the
Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO), and other
volunteers from area churches and civic
organizations.
“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our:
TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES
(How should we be allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
instructional practices?)
·5 TIME –
More professional development should be focused
on the individual needs of the school.
·6 MONEY
– Funds from teacher accounts should be more
accessible for teachers to spend at a variety of
locations and school supply stores to provide
the best equipment for each teacher’s
instructional day.
·7
PERSONNEL – A full-time art teacher is needed at
Elkton School.
·8 OTHER
RESOURCES – More parent involvement would be
greatly helpful.
|
|
Equity and
Adequacy: Are we providing equity and adequacy to all
of our teachers? Yes; all teachers have access to the
same funds, resources, time, supplies, etc.
Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to
meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective
with all their students? Yes; all materials and funds
are distributed equally.
Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the
needs of all students in our school? No; as if often the
case in education, Elkton School seems to meet the needs
of the middle students while often not completely
addressing the needs of the high and low achieving
students. |
Template 3.2.c: Instructional Summary Questions
(Rubric Indicator 3.4)
|
Instructional
Summary Questions-
Narrative Response Required |
|
What are our major
strengths and how do we know? There are several
instructional strengths of Elkton School. Information
about the strengths come from observations, surveys, and
interviews of teachers and students.
-Most teachers are willing to help students outside
of regular class time.
-Most classes have student/teacher ratios smaller
than required by state guidelines.
-There is a fully-equipped computer lab.
-A high percentage of teachers hold a Master’s Degree
or higher.
-All of the teachers are considered “highly
qualified” by NCLB qualifications.
-There are before- and after-school sessions for
tutoring and enrichment.
-There is a Quest class for gifted students.
|
|
Instructional
Summary Questions-
Narrative Response Required |
|
What are our major challenges and how do we know.
(These should be stated as instructional practice
challenges identified in the templates above, that could
be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in
component 1.) - Through teacher interviews, we
know that we must often supplement adopted material in
order to adequately address curriculum standards.
- Addition use of diverse instructional methods
should be used. |
|
Instructional
Summary Questions-
Narrative Response Required |
|
How will we
address our challenges?
- During professional development sessions,
curriculum standards should be addressed. Instructional
strategies to address those standards should be shared
and discussed among the faculty.
- Teachers should learn about and expand the use of
technology for instruction.
|
Template 3.3.a: Assessment Practices
(Rubric Indicators 3.5 and 3.6)
|
Current Assessment
Practices |
TCAP,
Including
Writing
Assessment |
DIBELS |
Think Link |
Accelerated
Reading |
Classroom
Assessment |
Brigance |
Screening/
Referral
Testing and
Evaluation |
|
Evidence of
Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) |
State-required
testing program |
State-required testing program |
100% of the
students in grades 1-8 participate in the Think Link
assessment program. |
This
school-wide program may be used by all students. |
Teacher
interviews; classroom observations show a wide variety
of assessment practices. |
Assessment
used especially in K-1. |
Screening is
done upon referral from the classroom teacher |
|
Is the
current practice research-based? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Is it a
principle & practice of high-performing schools? |
Yes;
participation is in schools throughout Tennessee |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Has the
current practice been effective or ineffective? |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
|
What data
source(s) do you have that support your answer?
(identify all applicable sources) |
Numerous
reports are produced by TCAP data. More information is
gathered through TVAAS data. |
Because of
the short amount of time that the program has been in
place, there is only a small amount of data available. |
Reports from
the Think Link tests; TCAP reports |
Student
reports of scores for A.R. points |
Student
report cards; TCAP reports |
Interview
with teachers; scores from the assessment |
Individual
screening and testing results |
|
Evidence of
effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of
quantifiable improvement) |
Improvements
in AYP scores |
At this time,
this new assessment appears to be effective. |
The
administrative and teacher reports indicate to teachers
areas of the curriculum to be strengthened. |
This
supplemental program is used to encourage reading. |
Classroom
assessment helps students and teachers know skills that
must be reinforced. |
Teachers use
information from this assessment to help students,
especially in areas of weaknesses. |
Teachers use
this type of assessment to assist in finding the best
help for the referred students |
|
Evidence of
equitable school support for this practice |
All students
in grades 2-8 participate in TCAP testing. |
Much support
for this program comes from the county level. |
All students
in grades 2-8 participate. |
All students
are able to participate in A.R. reading. |
All students
and teachers participate in some type of classroom
evaluation. |
This
assessment would be used for all students in the
specified grade level. |
All students
are eligible for any necessary screening. |
|
Next Step
(changes or continuations) |
Continue the
use of the state-mandated testing program and the use of
reports connected with this assessment.
|
Continue the
use of the DIBELS assessment to develop a useable data
base. |
Continue this
assessment process for language arts, math, and science.
Consider adding social studies as a part of the
assessment. |
Continue the
use of this supplemental program. Expand the list of
books available to scored. |
Continue
evaluation of students, but expand and vary the types of
evaluation. |
Continue the
use of this assessment. |
Continue this
process. |
Template 3.3.b: Assessment Gap Analysis
|
Assessment Gap
Analysis – Narrative
Response Required |
|
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And
OTHER RESOURCES
(How are we currently allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
assessment practices?)
·9 TIME –
For many years, the faculty and staff at Elkton
School have spent many hours collaboratively
analyzing and discussing TCAP test scores,
writing assessment scores, DIBELS, Brigance
testing, Think Link tests, state report cards,
and TVAAS data. TCAP scores are examined by both
faculty and staff and feedback is given on areas
of strength and weaknesses. A sample writing
test is given prior to the writing assessment
test. Time is spent providing students with
previous assessments from the state web page,
and sample prompts are given as practice in
class. Time is spent by the kindergarten
teachers on DIBELS practice and Brigance
testing. Teachers invest time in evaluating
student progress on the three Think Link
assessments given prior to TCAP testing. The
results are shared in class with the students,
and the areas of weakness become the focus of
improvement. The state report card is announced
to the faculty, staff, and students by the
principal. The principal spends an adequate
amount of time discussing the TVAAS data with
each individual teacher.
·10 MONEY
– Elkton School has used its funds to purchase
TCAP coaching workbooks for seventh- and
eighth-grade science. A Study Island membership
has been purchased for reading/language arts and
math. School funds are also used to purchase the
Think Link assessments for reading/language
arts, math, and science.
·11
PERSONNEL – An at-risk coach was assigned to
Elkton School for a total of seven weeks to work
with students who were deficient in the areas of
reading and math according to 2006-2007 TCAP
scores. All faculty and staff attend
professional development days centering on test
analysis.
·12 OTHER
RESOURCES – Elkton School uses other resources
for assessment purposes. The Accelerated Reader
program scores are averaged as a portion of the
students’ reading grades. Teachers use weekly
and/or chapter tests as only one means of
assessment.
“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our:
TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES
(How should we be allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
assessment practices?)
·9 TIME –
More time should be spent collaborating with the
grade-level teachers. Time should be spent
examining the newly funded software, including
Study Island, designed to help target specific
SPIs.
·10 MONEY
– Currently, funds are not used to purchase the
Think Link Assessment or Study Island membership
for social studies. These purchases should be
considered for the next school year.
·11
PERSONNEL – The school needs an at-risk coach
for more than the allotted seven weeks.
·12 OTHER
RESOURCES – Lack of funds is always a
deficiency. There are many resources that could
be purchased, but funds are not always
available.
|
|
Equity and
Adequacy: Are we providing equity and adequacy to all
of our teachers?
Yes. All teachers have the same opportunities of
professional development training concerning test
analysis.
Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to
meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective
with all their students?
Yes. Elkton School is currently meeting the needs of
all teachers with the variety of resources offered,
including the TCAP practice workbooks, Study Island
assessment program, and the county-funded United
Streaming program.
Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the
needs of all students in our school?
Yes.
Elkton School is meeting the needs of all students in
assessment. However, the faculty continues to strive for
improvement and explore the opportunities that are made
available to the teachers that will strengthen each
student academically. |
Template 3.3.c: Assessment Summary Questions
(Rubric Indicator 3.6)
|
Assessment Summary
Questions- Narrative
Response Required |
|
What are our major strengths and how do we know?
- Annual Open House designed for teaching the
parents about AYP, test analysis, SPIs, and a variety of
other assessment information.
- Instruction is aligned with assessments, and
assessments are aligned with state standards.
- Elkton School is in “good standing” based on NCLB
requirements. |
|
Assessment Summary
Questions- Narrative
Response Required |
|
What are our major challenges and how do we know.
(These should be stated as assessment practice
challenges identified in the templates above, that could
be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in
component 1.) - Data indicates that students
with disabilities typically score lower than other
subgroups.
- Students scoring as advanced are not consistently
showing gains.
- Students in grade 7 and 8 are not scoring well on
the TCAP tests. |
|
Assessment Summary
Questions- Narrative
Response Required |
|
How will we address our challenges?
During the 2008-2009 school year, the Think Link
Assessment will be given in social studies. In addition,
the social studies portion of the Study Island software
will be purchased to aid in raising test scores.
|
Template 3.4.a: Organizational Practices
(Rubric Indicators 3.7and 3.8)
|
Current
Organizational Practices |
Use of School’s Mission Statement |
Community/ Parent Involvement |
Curriculum |
Professional Development/
In-service |
School Safety |
Faculty and Staff Committees |
Student Organizations |
|
Evidence of
Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) |
The school’s
mission statement and beliefs are included in the
school’s website, the monthly newsletter, and on other
communications. The school’s mission and beliefs are
display throughout the building. The mission is read
every morning during announcements. |
Surveys;
school report card; PTO involvement; Elkton Historical
Society; First National Bank; People’s Bank; D.A.R.E.
program; Prospect United Methodist Church; Grandparents’
Day; Book Fairs |
Students in
all academic classes are exposed to the requirements as
listed in the state curriculum. |
100% of
faculty and staff members participate in professional
development. |
Safety
committee in place; drills practiced regularly. |
100% of
faculty and staff members are assigned to a committee.
Committees vary as according to needs or
responsibilities. |
Numerous
student organizations: sport teams, Student Council,
Beta Club |
|
Is the
current practice research-based? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Is it a
principle & practice of high-performing schools? |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Has the
current practice been effective or ineffective? |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
Effective |
|
What data
source(s) do you have that support your answer?
(identify all applicable sources) |
Surveys and
observations of students |
Records of
attendance and participation |
Teacher
surveys and observations |
Teacher
surveys |
Records in
office |
List of
committees and members on file with principal. |
Records of
participation |
|
Evidence of
effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of
quantifiable improvement) |
Surveys and
observations indicate that 100% of the students know and
understand the mission statement. |
Records
indicate good parent and community participation. |
100% of
academic teachers expose students to curriculum
requirements. |
100% of
Elkton faculty and staff participate in professional
development activities. |
Drills become
more and more efficient. |
Principal
would have on file the effectiveness of each committee. |
Organizations
are open to all but then must meet qualifications |
|
Evidence of
equitable school support for this practice |
For the use
of the mission statement, there is 100% participation
throughout the school. |
All have
opportunities to participate. |
All students
and teachers use the same state curriculum. |
Professional
development activities are open to all teachers. |
All faculty,
staff, and students participate in safety drills. |
All have
opportunities to participate. |
All students
are given opportunities to participate |
|
Next Step
(changes or continuations) |
Continue the
present uses of the mission statement. A change to make
would be to include the mission on all correspondence,
especially from the school office. |
Incorporate
more activities to involve parents. Consider rewarding
parent involvement with a banquet or awards program. |
Continue to
use all state curriculum components. |
Investigate
addition activities that will be school-specific
according to particular school needs. |
Continue to
promote safety and practice drills. |
Continue to
assign all faculty and staff members to committees for a
sense of responsibility. |
Continue to
promote student organizations to help involve students
and their families in school activities. |
Template 3.4.b: Organizational Gap Analysis
|
Organizational Gap
Analysis – Narrative
Response Required |
|
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And
OTHER RESOURCES
(How are we currently allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
organizational practices?)
·13 TIME
– Time is allotted for all activities, with
class time being protected for instruction.
·14 MONEY
– Records of funds for sporting events, student
clubs, and the PTO are kept and by allocated as
is necessary.
·15
PERSONNEL – Personnel are assigned to committees
according to needs and interests.
·16 OTHER
RESOURCES – Community support is always apparent
in time of fund raising events and sports
events.
“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our:
TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES
(How should we be allocating our time, money,
personnel and other resources and building capacity
around understanding and implementing high quality
organizational practices?)
·13 TIME
– All teachers and students should be made aware
of other classes instruction times.
·14 MONEY
– Funds should continue to be monitored.
·15
PERSONNEL – Personnel should be assigned
different organizational tasks as needs and
interest change.
·16 OTHER
RESOURCES – There is always a place for more
parent and community involvement.
|
|
Equity and
Adequacy: Are we providing equity and adequacy to all
of our teachers?
Yes. All teachers have opportunities to take on
leadership roles in the organizational practices of the
school.
Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to
meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective
with all their students?
Yes. With available funds and resources, the faculty
and staff of Elkton School do their very best in the
organizational practices of the school to best meet the
needs of the students.
Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the
needs of all students in our school?
Yes. However, there is always room for improvement.
Very few activities are held after school because of
transportation concerns. |
Template 3.4.c: Organization Summary Questions
(Rubric Indicator 3.8)
|
Organization
Summary Questions-
Narrative Response Required |
|
What are our major strengths and how do we know?
- All students have opportunities to participate in
the activities of the school.
- The organizational practices of Elkton School
are set up with regard to student instruction as being
the number one activity. |
|
Organization
Summary Questions-
Narrative Response Required |
|
What are our major
challenges and how do we know. (These should be stated
as organizational practice challenges identified
in the templates above, that could be a cause of the
prioritized needs identified in component 1.) - Being
a small rural school makes transportation for
after-school activities difficult for some students.
- As is true in most schools, there are some faculty
members who are more involved in activities than others.
|
|
Organization
Summary Questions-
Narrative Response Required |
|
How will we address our challenges?
- Teachers consistently find ways for students to be
involved in school activities.
- Teachers should be encouraged to protect the
instructional time. |
|
GOAL 1 – Action Plan Development |
|
Template 4.1
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.1)
Revised DATE: May 1, 2008 |
|
Section A –Describe your goal and
identify which need(s) it addresses. (Remember that your
previous components identified the strengths and
challenges/needs.) |
|
Goal |
Students will score in
the proficient to advanced range on the TCAP math test
during each school year beginning with the 2008-2009
school year, with emphasis on moving from the proficient
to the advanced range. |
|
Which need(s) does this Goal address? |
This goal is set in
response to data reported in SIP Component 1B, Academic
and Non-academic Data, found on page _____.
|
|
How is this Goal linked to the system’s
Five-Year Plan? |
This goal is the same
as the system goal listed in the five-year plan. |
|
ACTION STEPS – Template 4.2
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.2) |
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Template 4.3
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.3) |
|
Section C – For each of
the Action Steps you list, give timeline, person(s)
responsible, projected cost(s)/required resources,
funding sources, evaluation strategy and performance
results/outcomes. (For Evaluation Strategy, define how
you will evaluate the action step.) |
|
Timeline |
Person(s) Responsible |
Required Resources |
Projected Cost(s) & Funding Sources |
Evaluation Strategy |
Performance Results / Outcomes |
|
Action Step
One |
Think Link/PAS test
will be given each year to help students practice
test-taking skills prior to the TCAP test and to assist
teachers in evaluating the progress of students and the
effectiveness of math instruction in grades 1-8. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports
of test results will be given to each teacher soon after
each testing session. |
School administrator Bob Polly;
classroom math teachers |
Test manuals and answer sheets for
each student |
Approximately $10.75 per student each
year provided with school general fund |
Teacher use of testing results to
assist in lesson planning according to skills in need of
additional instruction; administrator will monitor use
of testing results by teacher and student test scores |
|
|
Step
Two |
Software that
accompanies adopted math series will be utilized in the
computer lab to increase math competency. |
Fall of 2007 through spring 2011; to
be reviewed at the end of each semester by teachers for
effectiveness |
Grade-level math teachers coordinating
with Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator |
Software and computer lab |
No costs; provided with textbook
materials |
Computer Lab Facilitator will provide
teachers with reports of skills progress |
|
|
Action Step
Two |
Software that accompanies adopted math series will
be utilized in the computer lab to increase math
competency. |
Fall of 2007 through spring 2011; to
be reviewed at the end of each semester by teachers for
effectiveness |
Grade-level math teachers coordinating
with Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator |
|
No costs; provided with textbook
materials |
Computer Lab Facilitator will provide teachers with
reports of skills progress
|
|
|
Action Step
Three |
Students targeted through test score evaluations
will work with a county-wide At-Risk coach for
thirty-five days, working in small groups and
individually for thirty minute sessions daily to
increase math competency. |
Winter 2008 through spring 2009;
weekly updates will be given to classroom teachers |
Janet Rose, At-Risk Coach,
coordinating with math teachers |
Unused classroom space |
County provided personnel and
appropriate materials |
The At-Risk team, coordinated by Sue
Whittemore, will evaluate the effectiveness of the
project comparing 2007 and 2008 test score results |
|
|
Action Step
Four |
Study Island Assessment Preparation Program will be
used to improve math skills in areas identified by
classroom math teachers coordinating with the Computer
Lab Facilitator. |
January 2008 through June 2009;
written reports generated by the program will be
provided to teachers after each skill is completed |
Classroom math teachers; Sandra
McCullough, computer lab facilitator |
Computer lab; Study Island program |
$1477.00; state funds awarded through
At-Risk Project |
Targeted skills will be evaluated by
examining relevant TCAP subtest scores |
|
|
Action Step Five |
Teachers with expertise using AIMS (Activities
Integrating Math and Science) will help to teach faculty
and staff to implement these activities as part of their
math instruction. |
Winter 2008 through spring 2009; use
of activities will be reported in surveys at the end of
each semester |
AIMS trained teachers |
AIMS materials and instructions |
$500.00 - $1000; school general fund
for supplies |
Teacher observation; student
assessment after each activity; monitoring of TCAP
scores; completed survey forms |
|
|
Action Step Six |
Teachers should demonstrate use of the food cart
provided by the Tennessee Nutrition and Consumer
Education Program as used especially for math situations
involving measurement. |
Summer 2008; use of activities will be
in surveys at the end of each semester |
Kristy Butler, Jennifer Wilsford,
Elizabeth May |
TNCEP Food Cart; food |
$25.00 - $50.00; school general fund
for demonstration purposes |
Teacher reports using surveys at the
end of each presentation; evaluating TCAP subtest scores
relating to measurement |
|
|
Action Step Seven |
Organized class competitions across the grade
levels beginning with timed tests for basic facts and
increasing difficulty to include practical applications
and word problems. |
Fall 2007 through spring 2008 in
grades 1-3; Fall 2008 through spring 2009 in grades 4-8;
competition results will be announced in school
newsletters |
Grade-level math chairpersons |
Timer |
No cost |
Teacher evaluation; reports made at
faculty meetings at least once per semester; evaluation
of math TCAP scores |
|
|
GOAL 2 – Action Plan Development |
|
Template 4.1
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.1)
Revised DATE: May 1, 2008 |
|
Section A –Describe your goal and
identify which need(s) it addresses. (Remember that your
previous components identified the strengths and
challenges/needs.) |
|
Goal |
Students will score in
the proficient or advanced range on the TCAP social
studies test during each school year beginning with
2008-2009, with emphasis on moving students from the
proficient to the advanced range. |
|
Which need(s) does this Goal address? |
This goal is set in
place to address the need concerning social studies
improvement as identified in data reported in SIP
component 1B, Academic and Nonacademic Data found on
page ______. |
|
How is this Goal linked to the system’s
Five-Year Plan? |
This goal is the same
as the system goal listed in the five-year plan. |
|
ACTION STEPS – Template 4.2
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.2) |
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Template 4.3
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.3) |
|
Section C – For each of
the Action Steps you list, give timeline, person(s)
responsible, projected cost(s)/required resources,
funding sources, evaluation strategy and performance
results/outcomes. (For Evaluation Strategy, define how
you will evaluate the action step.) |
|
Timeline |
Person(s) Responsible |
Required Resources |
Projected Cost(s) & Funding Sources |
Evaluation Strategy |
Performance Results / Outcomes |
|
Action Step One |
Teachers will continue
development of a social studies scope and sequence for
each grading period. |
Developed in July 2007 through August
2007; to be reviewed in summer 2008 and at the end of
each grading period by social studies teachers for
effectiveness |
Grade-level social studies
chairpersons with the assistance of Kelley Deason and
Angela Mayes |
Time for collaborative planning |
No cost |
Grade-level meetings will include
planning sessions for upcoming goals and objectives
according to state curriculum |
|
|
Action Step
Two |
Teachers will use
United Streaming videos and the corresponding
information to reinforce grade-level social studies
objectives. |
August 2008 through May 2009; each
user will keep a log to be turned in at the end of the
semester |
Betty Ford, system-wide technology
specialist; Connie Walls, school United Streaming
contact |
Time for collaborative planning |
$9,284.00 per year for county license;
from county funds for continued purchase of the United
Streaming license |
Teacher observations; monitoring
student assessments showing comprehension of topics |
|
|
Action Step Three |
Teachers will provide
and share ideas concerning activities to help implement
the social studies curriculum in the form of
mini-lessons to be presented to other teachers during
professional development sessions. |
January 2008 through August 2008; to
be presented during professional development sessions;
survey use of ideas throughout the school year |
Classroom teachers; Rita McDonald,
coordinator of school’s professional development |
Time for collaborative planning |
No cost |
Observations of school administrator,
Bob Polly; teacher observations of lessons; survey use
of new ideas in the classrooms |
|
|
Action Step Four |
Students will read and
be read nonfiction and historical fiction books that are
cohesive with the social studies curriculum. |
Use through spring semester 2009;
monitor student comprehension after each completed book |
Classroom teachers; Carol Abernathy,
librarian |
Appropriate
Books |
No cost; use of library books or free
trade books |
Monitor TCAP scores in social studies
and reading; monitor regular classroom assessments for
comprehension of books read; use of Accelerated Reader
computerized comprehension tests |
|
|
Action Step Five |
Using the computer lab,
students will research social studies topics using
Internet sites in order to enhance the social studies
curriculum. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; survey
sites used at the end of each grading period |
Classroom teachers; Sandra McCullough,
computer lab facilitator |
Computer lab; |
No cost |
Monitor TCAP scores for indications of
improvement; monitor regular classroom assessments for
indications of improved social studies grades |
|
|
Action Step Six |
Study Island State
Assessment Preparation Program will be used to improve
social studies skills in grades seven and eight. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; skills
reports provided to teachers generated by the Study
Island Program documenting student mastery of targeted
skills |
Terrance Cross, social studies
teacher; Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator |
Computer Lab; Study Island program |
$145.00 per grade level |
Monitor Think Link/PAS test results of
targeted skills; monitor TCAP sores in relevant subtests |
|
|
Action Step Seven |
Teachers will explore
various projects, field trips, and resource persons to
enhance the social studies curriculum. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009;
teachers will report projects in written form |
Social studies teachers; Carol
Abernathy, librarian |
Internet access |
Cost will vary for each activity; PTO
funding and student contributions; school general fund |
Teacher observation and reports of
projects; monitor TCAP test scores |
|
|
Action Step Eight |
Think Link/PAS tests
will be given each year to help students practice
test-taking skills prior to the TCAP tests and to help
teachers evaluate the progress of students. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports
of test results will be given to teachers soon after
each testing session |
Classroom social studies teachers; Bob
Polly, school administrator |
Test manuals and answer sheets for
each student |
Approximately $10.75 per student each
school year |
Teacher use of testing results to
assist in lesson planning with adjustments being made to
accommodate for skill needs, administration will
evaluate test effectiveness |
|
|
GOAL 3 – Action Plan Development |
|
Template 4.1
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.1)
Revised DATE: May 1, 2008 |
|
Section A –Describe your goal and
identify which need(s) it addresses. (Remember that your
previous components identified the strengths and
challenges/needs.) |
|
Goal |
Students will score in
the proficient or advanced range on the TCAP science
test during each school year, with advancements being
made in the 2008-2009 school year. |
|
Which need(s) does this Goal address? |
This goal is set in
place to address the need concerning science improvement
as listed in SIP Component 1B, Academic and Non-Academic
Data, found on page ______. |
|
How is this Goal linked to the system’s
Five-Year Plan? |
|
|
ACTION STEPS – Template 4.2
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.2) |
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Template 4.3
–
(Rubric
Indicator 4.3) |
|
Section C – For each of
the Action Steps you list, give timeline, person(s)
responsible, projected cost(s)/required resources,
funding sources, evaluation strategy and performance
results/outcomes. (For Evaluation Strategy, define how
you will evaluate the action step.) |
|
Timeline |
Person(s) Responsible |
Required Resources |
Projected Cost(s) & Funding Sources |
Evaluation Strategy |
Performance Results / Outcomes |
|
Action Step One |
Teachers will use
United Streaming videos and presentations along with the
corresponding information to reinforce the science
curriculum and science objectives in grades K-8. |
August 2008 through May 2009; use to
be reported each semester in survey form |
Grade-level science teachers; Betty
Ford, system-wide technology specialist; Connie Walls,
school United Streaming contact |
|
$9,284.00 per year for county license;
from county funds for continued purchase of the United
Streaming license |
Teacher observations; student
assessments showing comprehension of topics |
|
|
Action Step Two |
Teachers will create a
science scope and sequence for each grading period. |
Developed in summer 2007; review at
the end of each grading period for effectiveness; full
review in the summer of 2008 |
Grade-level science chairpersons;
Kristy Butler, teacher resource contact |
Time for collaborative planning |
No cost |
Grade-level meetings will include
planning sessions for upcoming goals and objectives
according to the state curriculum |
|
|
Action Step Two |
Teachers will create a science scope and sequence
for each grading period. |
Developed in summer 2007; review at
the end of each grading period for effectiveness; full
review in the summer of 2008 |
Grade-level science chairpersons;
Kristy Butler, teacher resource contact |
|
No cost |
Grade-level meetings will include
planning sessions for upcoming goals and objectives
according to the state curriculum |
|
|
Action Step Three |
Teachers will implement AIMS (Activities
Integrating Math and Science) activities to teach and
enhance the science curriculum. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; use of
activities will be reported in surveys |
Classroom science teachers; Claudia
Davis, teacher resource contact |
AIMS instructional materials |
$500.00-$1000.00 from general fund for
supplies for activities; $100.00 per year for each
teacher provided by the PTO |
Teacher observation; assessments after
each activity; monitor TCAP scores |
|
|
Action Step Four |
Science projects and experiments will be showcased
throughout the school for classes to share with various
grade levels and with parent and community groups. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports
about the projects and experiments will be presented in
the school’s monthly newsletter |
Classroom science teachers; Nadine
Herrington, school teacher contact |
Tables for displays |
No cost |
Teacher observation; monitor student
discussion concerning projects and experiments |
|
|
Action Step Five |
Think Link/PAS tests will be given each year to
help students practice test-taking skills prior to the
TCAP tests and to help teachers evaluate the progress of
students. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports
of test results will be given to teachers soon after
each testing session |
Classroom science teachers; Bob Polly,
school administrator |
Test manuals and answer sheets for
each student |
Approximately $10.75 per student each
school year |
Teacher use of testing results to
assist in lesson planning with adjustments being made to
accommodate for skill needs; administration will
evaluate test effectiveness |
|
|
Action Step Five |
Think Link/PAS tests will be given each year to
help students practice test-taking skills prior to the
TCAP tests and to help teachers evaluate the progress of
students. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports
of test results will be given to teachers soon after
each testing session |
Classroom science teachers; Bob Polly,
school administrator |
|
Approximately $10.75 per student each
school year |
Teacher use of testing results to
assist in lesson planning with adjustments being made to
accommodate for skill needs; administration will
evaluate test effectiveness |
|
|
Action Step Six |
Using the computer lab, students will research
science topics using Internet sites that enhance the
science curriculum in grades seven and eight. |
Winter 2008 through spring 2009;
survey sites used at the end of the grading period |
Nadine Herrington, seventh- and
eighth-grade science teacher; Sandra McCullough,
computer lab facilitator |
Computer lab |
No cost |
Monitor TCAP scores for indications of
improvements; monitor regular classroom assessments for
indications of improved science grades |
|
|
Action Step Seven |
More community, area-wide, state-wide, and
surrounding area resources will be used to bring
programs for whole-school and classroom presentations to
help enhance and reinforce the science curriculum. |
Continue through spring of 2009;
report effectiveness of each presentation at its
conclusion |
Bob Polly, school administrator; Carol
Abernathy, librarian |
Internet access |
No cost for presentations by
volunteers; $500.00 from school’s general funds set
aside to pay possible expenses |
Monitor classroom discussions for
understanding; monitor TCAP scores for indications of
improvement |
|
|
Action Step Eight |
Study Island State Assessment Preparation Program
will be used to improve science skills in grades seven
and eight. |
Fall 2008 through spring 2009; skills
reports provided to teachers generated by the Study
Island Program documenting student mastery of targeted
skills |
Nadine Herrington, science teacher;
Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator |
Computer lab and Study Island progam |
$145.00 per grade level |
Monitor Think Link/PAS test results of
targeted skills; monitor TCAP scores in relevant
subtests |
|
TEMPLATE 5.1: Process Evaluation
(Rubric Indicator 5.1)
|
Evidence of
Collaborative Process – Narrative
response required |
|
What evidence do we have that shows that a
collaborative process was used throughout the entire
planning process? At the end of the 2006-2007 school
year, the school improvement leadership team selected
individuals to serve as component chairs, team members,
and stakeholders for each TSIPP component. At a faculty
meeting, the school improvement leadership team
presented information concerning TSIPP component
information, the use of the rubrics, team and group
expectations, and a timeline. At the end of the meeting,
component chairs met with their team for a planning
session.
During the 2007-2008 professional development
activities, the school improvement leadership team
planned activities where all involved in the TSIPP
process worked collaboratively and discussed concerns,
asked questions, and set a deadline for the final
project. Chairpersons from each component gave updates
on each teams’ progress.
At the beginning of the 2007-2008 school year, chairs
began notifying their teams of monthly or bimonthly
meetings through morning announcements or through the
school’s e-mailed announcements. A member from the
school improvement leadership team was in attendance at
each meeting. At each meeting, team members were
expected to be present, take notes, and be an active
participant.
All faculty and staff members had a voice in the
planning process. |
|
Evidence of
Alignment of Data and Goals – Narrative
response required |
|
What evidence do we have that proves alignment
between our data and our goals? Much time and effort
has been placed on carefully aligning our data with our
goals. However, student progress determines changes that
will be made. Teachers review and analyze data daily to
determine if gains are being made. In each goal,
emphasis has been on moving students from the proficient
to the advanced range on the TCAP test in math, social
studies, and science. Teachers at Elkton School are
currently using multiple sources and supplemental
materials that anticipate such gains
Teachers rely on the PAS test in grades 1-8 for
reading, math, and science for clues on the state
performance indicators that need to be addressed.
Beginning in the 2008-2009 school year, students will be
exposed to the social studies portion of the PAS test.
Using this new test, teachers will have the advantage of
searching for areas of weakness.
With the addition of a computer technology
facilitator, in the 2007-2008 school year, students have
been exposed to the Study Island Assessment Program in
math, social studies, science, and reading. Teachers are
currently using this program for instruction, practice,
and testing on state performance indicators. United
Streaming videos and presentations are readily available
in all content areas providing instruction, practice,
and enrichment. Teachers spend at least two professional
development days analyzing and reviewing test data
Searching for approaches and methods that will lead
to student gains. |
|
Evidence of
Communication with All Stakeholders –
Narrative response required |
|
What evidence do we have of our communication of
the TSIPP to all stakeholders? Information is
communicated to all stakeholders in a variety of forms.
At the beginning of the 2007-2008 school year, Elkton
school held a very successful First Annual Open House
designated to inform parents of the school’s dedication
in improving student achievement. Parents met in the
gymnasium and were provided with a handout with a list
of frequently used terms and definitions related to
student achievement including state performance
indicators, benchmarks, Tennessee Value-Added Assessment
System, low performing schools, etc. Parents were given
an opportunity to ask questions on any term. Parents
were then invited to attend informative sessions with
teachers focusing on the state performance indicators,
testing for the year, and teacher/student expectations.
The school website is updated regularly and provides
a wealth of information to the public. The school’s
mission, vision, and beliefs are available, as well as a
link to information about A Blueprint for Learning:
‘The Teacher’s Guide to the Tennessee Curriculum.
The Giles County School’s web page has a link to the
Tennessee State Department of Education where the State
Report Card information can be assessed. All teachers
have a web page and may list classroom assignments,
activities, and awards received.
All students receive a monthly school newsletter that
provides information on the classroom and school
activities. The newsletter begins with the school’s web
address, mission statement, and notes to parents.
Teachers are encouraged to call or e-mail parents
concerning not only student weaknesses but also
successes.
Monthly faculty meetings focus on TSIPP progress,
student achievement, test results, and any professional
development opportunities focusing on student
achievement and testing.
Grade-level teachers are encouraged to collaborate on
assessment data and any other concerns dealing with
student achievement.
The School Leadership Team meets regularly to discuss
TSIPP progress. |
|
Evidence of
Alignment of Beliefs, Shared Vision, and Mission with
Goals – Narrative response required |
|
What evidence do we have that shows our beliefs,
shared vision and mission in Component 2 align with our
goals in Component 4? During the beginning of each
school year, the faculty and staff review the school’s
beliefs, vision, and goals to check for continued
relevancy. Changes are made as necessary. Consensus is
achieved.
The committee concerning specifically Component 2
reviews the work of other component committees to check
for alignment of the beliefs, vision, and mission with
all parts of the TSIPP, including the goal written in
Component 4. Minutes for the meetings are on file.
|
|
Evidence of
Alignment of Action Steps with Curriculum, Instruction,
Assessment and Organization – Narrative
response required |
|
What evidence do we have that shows our action
steps in Component 4 align with our analyses of the
areas of curriculum, instruction, assessment and
organization in Component 3? Using TCAP reports, TVAAS
data, and other measures, we know that our needs are in
the academic areas of math, social studies, and science.
We see particular needs in grades 7 and 8.
|
|
Suggestions for the
Process – Narrative response required |
|
What suggestions do we have for improving our
planning process? Teachers must be informed of all the
components of a plan and the requirements for each
component. These items should be reviewed on a regular
basis. |
TEMPLATE 5.2: Implementation Evaluation
(Rubric Indicator 5.2)
|
Evidence of
Implementation – Narrative response
required |
|
What is our plan to begin implementation of the
action steps? Beginning with professional development
time in July 2008, Elkton School goals will be reviewed
along with the action steps. Action steps will be
incorporated according to the assigned time schedule and
the needs of the students. |
|
Evidence of the Use
of Data – Narrative response required |
|
What is the plan for the use of data? Beginning
with July 2008 professional development days, teachers
will begin to assess data from the previous school year.
This data will be considered in assigning students to
classes, in setting class schedules, and in considered
different elements of the curriculum. Teachers will use
the data after they are assigned a class of students to
see the strengths and needs of individuals. |
TEMPLATE 5.3: Monitoring and Adjusting Evaluation
(Rubric Indicator 5.3)
|
Evidence of
Monitoring Dates – Narrative response
required |
|
What are the calendar dates (Nov/Dec and May/June)
when the School Leadership Team will meet to sustain the
Tennessee School Improvement Planning Process? Identify
the person(s) responsible for monitoring and the role
they will play in the monitoring process. The School
Leadership Team will meet regularly throughout the
school year. In November, the Team should meet to check
on accomplishments of action steps for the goals.
Rita McDonald, chairperson, Teri Mize, co-chair, and
Connie Walls, co-chair, will identify actions steps that
have been completed or begun. They will check the status
of other action steps. They will meet with groups of
teachers to help in the accomplishments of the school’s
goals. |
|
Evidence of a
Process for Monitoring Plan – Narrative
response required |
|
What will be the process that the School Leadership
Team will use to review the analysis of the data from
the assessments and determine if adjustments need to be
made in our plan? The Leadership Team will review all
data as it is released. They will review action steps
that involve the use of data and look for
accomplishments of those steps. When meeting as a
faculty, adjustments to action steps will be made as
necessary to be of the best benefit of the Elkton
students. |
|
Evidence of a
Process for Adjusting Plan – Narrative
response required |
|
What will be the process that the School Leadership
Team will use for adjusting our plan (person(s)
responsible, timeline, actions steps, resources,
evaluation strategies) when needed? Being a relatively
small school, adjustments in plans can usually be made
easily. After the Leadership Team sees a need or needs
for change, that information will be brought before the
faculty. Adjustments of the plans would be discussed at
that time. Depending on the necessary changes, the Team
may make necessary assignments or may have the faculty
reach consensus concerning changes. |
|
|
Evidence of a Plan
for Communicating to All Stakeholders –
Narrative response required |
|
How will the School Leadership Team communicate
success/adjustments of the plan to stakeholders and
solicit ongoing input from stakeholders? The School
Leadership Team will be leading the annual parent
meeting during the week of school registration. At that
time, parents will be informed of any necessary changes.
Discussion will be held at that time allowing for
comments or questions.
Parents and other stakeholders are regularly informed
about school news through announcements sent home,
newspaper articles, and school newsletters as well as
through phone calls and emails.
|
|
|