May 2008

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FOR
ELKTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


 E
ffective
 Learning
Kindles
Success


GILES COUNTY
176 COLLEGE STREET
ELKTON, TENNESSEE 38455
BOBBY POLLY, PRINCIPAL
 

Tennessee School Improvement Planning Process

(TSIPP)

Assurances

with Signature of Principal


I certify that
Elkton Elementary School has utilized the data and other requirements requested for each component.  The school will operate its programs in accordance with all of the required assurances and certifications for each program area.

I CERTIFY that the assurances referenced above have been satisfied to the best of my knowledge.

__________________________________ ___________________________

Signature of Principal Date signed

 

 

Component 1a – School Profile and Collaborative Process

1.1: SIP Leadership Team Composition

SIP Leadership Team Member Name

Leader-

ship Chair? (Y/N)

Position

Name of Subcommittee(s) (when applicable)

Rita McDonald Y Teacher, Leadership Team
Teri Mize Y Teacher, Leadership Team Co-Chair- Component 5
Connie Walls Y Teacher, Leadership Team Co-Chair- Component 5
Bobby Polly N Principal
Angela Mayes Y Teacher Component 1A
Brent Newton Y Teacher Component 1B
Pam Scott Y Teacher Component 1B
Susan Holley Y Teacher Component 2
Nadine Herrington Y Teacher Component 3-Curriculum
Jennifer Wilsford Y Teacher Component 3-Instruction
Kelley Deason Y Teacher Component 3-Assessment
Joshilyn Tucker Y Teacher Component 3-Organization
Carol Abernathy Y Teacher Component 4

 

1.2: Subcommittee Formation and Operation

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 1 School Profile and Collaborative Process

Member Name

Position

Chair

Angela Mayes Teacher

Yes

Melody Putman Secretary
Brent Newton Teacher

Yes

Pam Scott Teacher

Yes

Claudia Davis Teacher
Mary Jane Gentry Teaching Assistant
Nikki Riddle Teacher
Sherry Newman Teacher

 

Component 1 Subcommittee has met to address critical components of the SIP and minutes are on file.

x YES

NO

 
Subcommittee 1 Chair Signature

 

 

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 2 Beliefs, Mission and Vision

Member Name

Position

Chair

Susan Holley Teacher

Yes

Tammy Gaudette Teaching Assistant
Ricky Rose Teacher

 

Component 2 Subcommittee has met to address critical components of the SIP and minutes are on file.

x YES

NO

 
Subcommittee 2 Chair Signature

 

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 3 Curricular, Instructional, Assessment, and Organizational Effectiveness

Member Name

Position

Chair

Nadine Herrington Teacher

Yes

Marilyn Shaver Teacher
Jeannie Baker Teacher
Cassie Sanders Teaching Assistant
Sandra McCullough Teacher
Jennifer Wilsford Teacher

Yes

Elizabeth May Teacher
Vickie Edgmon Teaching Assistant
Paulette Bledsoe Teacher
Hank Calton Teacher
Kelley Deason Teacher

Yes

Doug Bassham Guidance Teacher
Mary Roper Teacher
Joshilyn Tucker Teacher

Yes

Jim May Teacher
Amanda Smith Teacher
Tina Carlton Nurse

 

Component 3 Subcommittee has met to address critical components of the SIP and minutes are on file.

x YES

NO

 
Subcommittee 3 Chair Signature

 

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 4 Action Plan Development

Member Name

Position

Chair

Carol Abernathy Librarian

Yes

Kristy Butler Teacher
Terrance Cross Teacher
Kim Rogers Teaching Assistant
Mary Laster Secretary
Sandra Grensberg Teaching Assistant

 

Component 4 Subcommittee has met to address critical components of the SIP and minutes are on file.

x YES

NO

 

Subcommittee 4 Chair Signature

 

Subcommittee for COMPONENT 5 The School Improvement Plan and Process Evaluation

Member Name

Position

Chair

Rita McDonald Teacher

Yes

Teri Mize Teacher
Connie Walls Teacher

 

Component 5 Subcommittee has met to address critical components of the SIP and minutes are on file.

x YES

NO

Subcommittee 5 Chair Signature

 

Component 1a – School Profile and Collaborative Process

1.3 Collection of Academic and Nonacademic Data and Analysis/Synthesis

1.3.1: Data Sources

Data Source Relevant Findings
TCAP Reports from

2004-2005,

2005-2006,

2006-2007

Used for information about student academic performance, strengths, and needs
Elkton School Report

Card

Used for findings about students, demographics, and other assorted data used throughout the report
TVAAS Reports Used for information about specific strengths and needs of Elkton students
Algebra Gateway Test Report Used for information about Honors Algebra students
Think Link Learning/

Predictive Assessment Series (PAS)

Used for information about student academic progress, with testing being administered three times per year.
DIBELS Assessment Used to assess kindergarten students
Elkton School Honor Roll Used to gain information about student success
Surveys of students Used to gain information about students and their views of the school; all surveys on hand for review
Surveys of teachers Used to gain a wealth of information about teachers including demographics and teaching practices
Surveys and formal/informal interviews

of parents, and community members

Used to gain demographic information about parents and community members; all surveys on file
Past Elkton School SIPs Used to gather historic data about the school

 

1.3.2: School and Community Data

Narrative and analysis of relevant school and community data and factors

SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS

Historical Background

Elkton School has a long history with many changes occurring as it has adapted to the needs of the Elkton community. School students first began meeting in 1810 in a log church. This location was later replaced by a large two-story building. Here students were taught simple reading, writing, arithmetic, and spelling. The Bible was often taught as well because many of the teachers were the preachers of the town.

By 1855, school was being held in a two-room building located in the yard of the old Grigsby home. In 1870, the school was moved into the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. Several years later, a one-room school was erected facing Baugh Road on the present school campus. This building was destroyed by a tornado in 1885, and a two-room building was constructed on a two-acre lot. Rooms and teachers were added as needed, and, in 1912, it became officially know as Elkton High School. In 1939, a new brick school building was erected which had six classrooms, a large auditorium, a music room, and a cloakroom. Again rooms were needed, and, by 1946, a new gym and elementary building had been added.

On August 6, 1972, fire destroyed most of the high school, leaving only the lower section, which contained the cafeteria and a few classrooms, and the upper section, which housed the agriculture shop and the gymnasium. School was held in portable classrooms for the next five years. After county-wide school consolidation, a new school was built to serve students in grades K through eight, opening in 1978.

Further construction was experienced in 1989. At this time, three new classrooms were added, enabling the science laboratory and music room to be used for their original purposes. The construction also allowed for additional special education classrooms.

A new wing was added to the school facility and opened in August 2003. The wing provided approximately 5500 square feet of new classroom space. This latest addition includes three classrooms, an art/activity room, a music room, a band room, student restrooms, and storage spaces.

Facilities

The present facilities of Elkton School include twenty-four classrooms and a variety of other areas. Eighteen classrooms are used as classes for grades kindergarten through eight. Other classrooms and areas are used for two special education classes, a Title I reading class, a Title I math class, speech therapy, guidance, and a school health clinic. Other facilities used to enhance students’ academic experiences include the library, a pre-K classroom, a music room, a band room, a cafeteria and kitchen, and a gymnasium with basketball courts and a stage area.

In January 2007, one classroom was used in which to install a new computer lab. This lab consists of one teacher workstation connected to an overhead-mounted projector and twenty-four student stations. Each computer is connected to a school server and has Internet access.

The administrative offices include a reception area, the principal’s office, the bookkeeper’s office, a secured area for students’ records, and two conference rooms. Two teacher work areas are available, one on each of the two floors of the school. The building houses eighteen student restroom facilities and two teacher restroom facilities located in the upstairs work area. An intercom system and surveillance equipment are located in the hallways and at the entrance areas.

The outside campus offers tow playground areas including a track, a paved area with basketball goals, climbing equipment, and other playground equipment. An outside storage building is available as well. Two paved parking areas are available for teacher and visitor parking.

Environmental and Safety Concerns

Having a safe and secure environment for Elkton student s is a top priority of the school staff and parents. The building has a security system with shock and motion sensors. Cameras film entrances and exits of the building and all hallways twenty-four hours each day. All exterior doors, with the exception of the main office door, are locked from the outside at all times. All doors can be exited at any time. Visitors must enter through the office to sign in and notify the office staff of their presence in the building.

Emergency management personnel from various local agencies regularly conduct school safety inspections. These teams prepare official reports with recommendations to enhance school safety. As a result of some of the reports, extra fire extinguishers have been placed in recommended locations, ten communication devices have been purchased, and changes have been made in protocol regarding fire drill procedures. Drills are held regularly for fire and weather emergencies.

Grade Distribution

Grade

Number of Students

Pre-K

13

Kindergarten

23

First

35

Second

39

Third

41

Fourth

46

Fifth

29

Sixth

32

Seventh

40

Eighth

40

Total

338

 

Length of the School Year and Length of the School Day

Each school year consists of 180 days for students to be present as mandated by the State of Tennessee. The length of the student day is seven hours.

Operating Budget Distribution Equity

Using the plan for expenditures of instructional funds as directed by the Giles County School System and the Tennessee Department of Education, Elkton School distributes funds to several departments within the school. A minimum of $3.00 per student in grades K-3 and $2.00 per student in grades 4-12 must be spent in each of two areas: (1) library resources and (2) instructional materials/supplies. For each teacher, $200.00 is included in these funds. All funds are budgeted by the school’s Instructional Planning Committee. From county funds, there was $6,085.50 available for these departments during the 2006-2007 school year. During the 2007-2008 school year, county funds of $5,828.00 were made available to the school. The total funds allocated from all sources for 2007-2008 was $14,294.00. The principal, together with the Instructional Planning Committee, determine the distribution of the funds to different instructional areas.

For the 2007-2008 school year, the following distributions were made:

K-3 4-8

Library Resources $ 904.50 $1,201.50

Instructional Materials/Supplies $1,466.24 $1,943.76

Health $ 134.00 $ 178.00

_____________________________

Total Funds Budgeted $5,828.00

Teacher Accounts (available at Central Office) $5,200.00

Fee Allocation $2,370.00

_____________________________

Total $7,570.00

Discretionary Funds 896.00

_____________________________

Total funds Allocated From All Sources $14,294.00


Per Pupil Expenditures

In referring to the Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE) Report Card for Giles County for 2007, the per pupil expenditures per average daily attendance (ADA) was $7740.00 within the county. This money was funded locally by 34.7%, was funded at the state level by 54.6, and at the federal level at 10.6%.

At the school level, pupil expenditures are about $43.00.

 

Administration, Faculty, and Staff Demographics including Years of Experience

Grade/subject

Assigned at

Elkton during

2007-2008

Educator Highest

Degree

Earned/

University

Highly

Qualified

Total

Years

Teaching

Total

Years

At

Elkton

Principal Bobby Polly M.Ed./MTSU   37 30
Pre-K-

all subjects

Paulette Bledsoe B.S./

MMC

yes 2 2
Kindergarten-

all subjects

Joshilyn Tucker B.S./

Athens State

yes 32 27
Kindergarten-

all subjects

Nikki Riddle B.S./

MMC

yes 7 7
First Grade-

all subjects

Claudia Davis M.Ed./

MTSU

yes 32 28
First Grade-

all subjects

Pam Scott M.Ed./

Cumberland U.

yes 17 17
Second Grade-

all subjects

Marilyn Shaver M.Ed./

U. of Louisville

yes 24 17
Second Grade-

all subjects

Elizabeth May M.E./

MTSU

yes 24 21
Third Grade-

all subjects

Kristy Butler B.S./

Lipscomb

yes 35 35
Third Grade-

all subjects

Jennifer Wilsford M.Ed./

Cumberland U.

yes 10 10
Fourth Grade-

all subjects

Rita McDonald Ed.S./

MTSU

yes 27 26
Fourth Grade-

all subjects

Amanda Smith M.Ed./

MTSU

yes 8 8
Fifth Grade-

all subjects

Kelley Deason Ed.S./

MTSU

yes 16 16
Fifth Grade-

all subjects

Angela Mayes M.Ed.+45/

MTSU

yes 16 16
Sixth Grade-

language arts;

social studies

Jim May M.Ed./

MTSU

yes 31 20
Sixth Grade-

science; math;

social studies

Connie Walls Ed.S./

MTSU

yes 15 15
Seventh- and

Eighth-Grade-

science;

reading

Nadine Herrington M.Ed./

Trevecca

yes 35 33.5
Seventh- and

Eighth-Grade-

language arts

Teri Mize Ed. S./

MTSU

yes 15 15
Seventh- and

Eighth-Grade-

math; algebra;

reading

Brent Newton M.Ed./

TSU

yes 20 19
Seventh- and

Eighth-Grade-

social studies;

reading

Terrance Cross M.Ed./

Cumberland U.

yes 10 10
K - Eighth-

Physical

Education

Ricky Rose M.Ed./

TSU

yes 27 25
K – Eighth-

Librarian

Carol Abernathy

 

M.Ed./

Trevecca

yes 26 24
K – Eighth-

Music

Susan Holley M.Ed./

UNA

yes 25 22
K – Eighth-

Guidance

Doug Bassham M.A.+30/

UNA,MTSU

yes 18 4
K – Fourth-

Special

Education

Jeannie Baker M.Ed./

Trevecca

yes 21.5 1
Fifth-Eighth –

Special

Education

Mary Roper B.S./ yes 4 1
Title I

Reading

Sharon Newman

 

M.Ed./

Cumberland U.

yes 26 26
Title I

Math

Hank Calton B.S./

MTSU

yes 28 8
K – First

Teaching

Assistant

Vickie Edgmon H.S. yes 9 9
Second – Third

Teaching

Assistant

Kim Rogers A.A./ yes 2 2
Special

Education

Assistant

Cassie Sanders H.S. yes 5 5
Special

Education

Assistant

Mary Jane Gentry A.A./ yes 3 3
One-on-One

Assistant

Sandra Grensberg A.A./

MMC

yes 4 4
Pre-K

Assistant

Tammy

Gaudette

H.S. yes 4 2
Registered

Nurse

Tina Carlton A.D.Nursing/ yes 17 4
Secretary/

Bookkeeper

Mary Laster A.S./

Calhoun CC

--- --- 11
Secretary/

Library Assistant

Melody Putman H.S. --- --- 10
Custodian Brenda Mitchell H.S. --- --- 8
Custodian Trudy Moore H.S. --- --- 2
Part-time

Custodian

Bobby Butler H.S. --- --- 1
Cafeteria

Manager

Sheila Gordon H.S. --- 4 3
Cafeteria

Worker

Barbara Butler H.S. --- --- 8
Cafeteria

Worker

Becky Watson H.S. --- --- 3
Part-time

Cafeteria worker

Buford Gardner H.S. --- --- 1
Part-time

Cafeteria worker

Renee

Bellefant

H.S. --- --- 1


Elkton Elementary School employs 45 faculty and staff members.


Percentage of Courses Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

All teachers meet the standards of federal regulations for being considered “highly qualified.” Therefore, 100% of all courses are taught by highly qualified teachers.

Percentage of Faculty Teaching Courses Outside Their Area of Certification

No teacher is teaching outside of his or her area of certification. Therefore, the percentage of teachers teaching outside of their area of certification is 0%.

Enrollment Data

Total enrollment for the 2007-2008 school year is 338 students.

 

Curriculum Offerings

A full curriculum is taught at Elkton School. Students in grades K-2 and grades 4-5 are self-contained classes, covering the subjects of English, reading, spelling, math, science, and social studies. Students in grades 3 and 6-8 exchange classes for those same subjects. Special area teachers are responsible for instruction in library skills, guidance, computer skills and technology, and physical education. All grade-level teachers are responsible for art instruction.

For eighth-grade students, an Honors Algebra I class is offered to eligible students.

Unique Programs

Students in first-, second-, and third-grade take part in a program called “Second Step.” It is led by a trained social service worker and lasts for one semester. The program continues in the fourth- and fifth-grades as “Conflict Resolution.” Students in the fifth grade participate in the D.A.R.E. program designed to promote abstinence from the use of drugs and alcohol. A county sheriff’s deputy staffs this twelve-week program. Third-grade students participate in the Tennessee Nutrition and Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) through the UT Agriculture and Extension Service. Beginning in the 2006-2007 school year, a school-wide sustained silent reading (SSR) program was implemented.

Honors Classes

For eligible eighth-grade students, an Honor Algebra I class is offered.

Advanced Placement Classes

Algebra I for eligible students is the only Advanced Placement class offered at Elkton. Students must pass the Gateway Exam during the last six-weeks to receive a high school credit.

Parental Support

Parental involvement is very important to the overall success of the school. Some of the services parents provide include serving as room parents, volunteering during book fairs, organizing the yearbook, serving as trip chaperones, assisting in field day, organizing numerous Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO) events, sponsoring an annual talent show, and helping teachers with a variety of classroom projects.

Drug, Alcohol, or Tobacco Incidents or Arrests

During 2006-2007, there was one alcohol-related incident.

School-Business Partnerships

Community support for Elkton School is also essential to the success enjoyed by the school. Funding assistance through the Adopt-a-School program has supported monetary awards for student achievement in programs such as the science fair, the spelling bee, and essay contest. Community members and local business people serve as judges for many of the student activities. Local banks award savings bonds and other monetary awards to honor roll students and eighth-grade students with the highest grade point averages. In the last school year, over one hundred local and county businesses made donations to support activities of Elkton School. During the 2006-2007 school year, two community churches encouraged reading literacy among the student body by purchasing books at each of the school’s two book fairs for students who would have otherwise been financially unable to purchase a book.

Mobility and Longevity of Staff at the School

Teachers at Elkton Elementary are very committed to the school and the community. More than half of the teachers have taught at Elkton School for more than fifteen (15) years. The average of the total years experience is 21 years.

Grant Awards

During the most recent years, no faculty members of Elkton School have applied for any grants.

Highly Qualified Paraprofessionals

Elkton School paraprofessionals are all “highly qualified,” according to NCLB requirements. All paraprofessionals have passed the necessary exams and/or have at least an Associate’s Degree.

Trained and Qualified Mentors

While no teachers have been trained officially as mentors, each new teacher is assigned to work with an experienced teacher. The two teachers often teach the same grade level together. This does give the new teacher a qualified mentor with whom to work.

 

STUDENT POPULATION DATA

Number of Students

There are 338 students enrolled for the 2007-2008 school year.

English Proficiency

During 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, Elkton students have been 100% English proficient.

Free and Reduced Lunch Rate (Economically Disadvantaged)

For the 2007-2008 school year, 241 of the 338 students participate in the Free and Reduced Lunch Program. The free and reduced lunch rate is 71%.

Discipline Referrals

Using information from the 2006-2007 state report card, there were six students suspended. Of the six suspended, five were males (2.8%), one was female (0.6%), five were white (1.6%), and one was black (3.1%).

Retention Rate

In May 2007, 98.9% of all students were promoted.

Transfer Rate (Mobility)

For the 2006-2007 school year, Elkton School ended the year with 322 students. Throughout the year, 355 students were enrolled, with the difference being 33 students.

Drop-Out Rate and Graduation Rate

For Giles County High School, the 2007 graduation rate was 76.5%. The cohort dropout rate was 12.7%. The event dropout rate was 2.5%

Special Education Disability Types, Numbers, and Percents

In this category, there are 50 students identified in the special education program, with 7 students in Quest/Gifted, 10 students receiving services for speech and other students with language impairments, functionally delayed, and autism.

Students Attending Preschool

Of students in the 2007-2008 kindergarten class, 12 of 23 attended a pre-school program.

Extracurricular Activities

Extracurricular activities are available to students who are interested and meet the academic and conduct requirements. Sports programs offered to sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students include the South Giles Eagles football team, made up of students from both Elkton and Minor Hill School, and the South Giles Eagles soccer team, made up of girls from both schools. The sports program also offers both a boys’ and girls’ basketball team, the Elks and Lady Elks, and the Elkton cheerleading squad.

Academic opportunities offered to students include the Scholastic Bowl team, for seventh- and eighth-graders, and the Beta Club, Student Council, and Fellowship of Christian Athletes for those in grades six through eight. Students in grades three through eight can enter the school Spelling Bee with winners advancing to the county-wide competition. Seventh- and eighth-grade county Spelling Bee winners advance to a statewide contest.

Regular 4-H meetings are held at the school, with all fourth- and fifth-grade students joining the organization. Sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students may also join 4-H and participate in the meetings at the school.

Student Attitudes/ Perceptual Data

From past survey and interviews, students feel safe at Elkton School. For the most part, the students have positive attitudes toward their school and the activities in which they are engaged while there. They feel as if they could receive help from most any teacher.

 

PARENT OR GUARDIAN DEMOGRAPHICS

Race, Ethnicity, Marital Status, Level of Education, Employment Status, and Income Level

Parents and guardians were asked to complete a survey concerning demographic information. The amount of surveys returned was very good. The following information was gathered: 79% are married; 21% are single; 14% have some high school but no diploma; 35% have a high school diploma or GED; 20% have some college; 26% have a college degree; and 6% have advanced college degrees.

 

COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

Elkton is a small community out from Pulaski, Tennessee. The economic level is low, and there are no major employers in the area. There are no private schools, group homes, or homeless shelter in the Elkton area.

 

Component 1b – Academic and Non-Academic Data Analysis/Synthesis

The latest SIP for Elkton School was revised and developed in May 2007. This was done in order to coordinate with a five-year review for the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). Since that time, the SIP has often been reviewed and referred to by the Elkton faculty and staff. Many other school-level reports and documents are used by the faculty. Academic and non-academic data sources are reviewed regularly by the faculty and school administration. Those sources are listed in section 1.4.

The collected data and an analysis of that data are given in section 1.5. Information concerning disaggregated data is given in section 1.6. A synthesis of all data is given in section 1.7. Prioritized goal targets are listed in section 1.8.

In assessing the academic and non-academic needs of Elkton School, many sources of data were utilized. These sources were used to conduct careful examination and further interpretation of student events. Extracted data from these sources is presented in this component. Included in the inquiry were the sources listed below:

 

1.4: Variety of Academic and Non-Academic Assessment Measures

List Data Sources
TCAP Reports from 2004-2005, 2005-2006, 2006-2007
Elkton School Report Cards
2007 TVAAS School Report for Elkton Elementary in Giles County:

TCAP CRT for Reading/Language, Math, Social Studies, and Science

TCAP Writing Assessment Results

 

Algebra Gateway Test Results
Think Link/PAS Test Information for Grades 2 through 8
DIBELS Assessment for Kindergarten
Elkton Elementary School Honor Roll for Grades 1 through 8
Observations and surveys and assorted information from various committees and stakeholders


1.5: Data Collection and Analysis

Describe the data collection and analysis process used in determining your strengths and needs.

ACADEMIC DATA AND ANALYSIS

TCAP Tests

Students in the Giles County School System participate in the achievement assessment program as prescribed by the State of Tennessee Department of Education. Even though the TCAP test is not required by the State of Tennessee for grades K-2, the Giles County Board of Education has for many years required TCAP testing for all students in grades K-8. Beginning in 2006-2007, the decision was made that kindergarten students would not be tested using the TCAP test but would instead use the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) for assessment purposes.

Because K-2 testing is not required, little information concerning test scores is available for K-2 students. As a result, teachers at Elkton School have always studied the reports provided to them to help draw conclusions and prepare for the next school year. On the TCAP report entitled “Objectives Performance Summary,” the percent of students mastering tested objectives can be useful information

schoolwide. To help put the information into a more concise and useable form,

charts have been developed. To arrive at a score for reading/language, all subtests concerning those subjects have been averaged. The same has been done to calculate scores for math, social studies and science. This type of calculation gives a comparison across all grade levels.

 

Percent of Students Mastering Reading/Language

(Advanced or Proficient)

 

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

1st grade

78%

49%

77%

2nd grade

89%

75%

54%

3rd grade

97%

96%

98%

4th grade

84%

94%

94%

5th grade

89%

100%

100%

6th grade

94%

86%

97%

7th grade

79%

83%

84%

8th grade

89%

92%

91%

(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging percentages of mastery in all subtests for reading, language, vocabulary, word analysis, language mechanics, and spelling.)

Percent of Students Mastering Math

(Advanced or Proficient)

 

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

K

58%

73%

--

1st grade

63%

45%

61%

2nd grade

69%

67%

47%

3rd grade

90%

92%

92%

4th grade

84%

83%

93%

5th grade

84%

95%

96%

6th grade

95%

91%

90%

7th grade

87%

86%

81%

8th grade

85%

78%

83%

(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging percentages of mastery in all subtests for mathematics and math computation.)

 

Percent of Students Mastering Social Studies

(Advanced or Proficient)

 

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

K

     

1st grade

79%

63%

80%

2nd grade

91%

79%

60%

3rd grade

83%

89%

93%

4th grade

79%

84%

88%

5th grade

72%

83%

96%

6th grade

87%

86%

87%

7th grade

60%

70%

73%

8th grade

74%

69%

62%

(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging percentages of mastery in all subtests for social studies.)


Percent of Students Mastering Science

(Advanced or Proficient)

 

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

K

     

1st grade

62%

43%

57%

2nd grade

74%

69%

52%

3rd grade

93%

92%

85%

4th grade

84%

89%

88%

5th grade

69%

87%

84%

6th grade

92%

84%

98%

7th grade

67%

67%

66%

8th grade

72%

66%

70%

(Information for the chart above was calculated by averaging percentages of mastery in all subtests for science.)

 

By using this type of calculation, there is evidence of grades 3, 4, and 5 maintaining or increasing mastery in reading/language arts, math, and social studies. Grade 1 improved in all subject areas, but grade 2 declined in every subject area. Students in grade 6 improved in all areas with the exception of math. For grades 7 and 8, scores remained steady in reading/language arts and social studies but declined slightly in math and science.

In addition to the mastery information, teachers also study the TCAP report entitled “Performance Level Summary Report.” This report has been available in its present form for only two school years and is available for grades 3-8. From this report, information can be gathered concerning the percent of students in each performance level of advanced, proficient, and below proficient.

Performance Levels for Reading/Language Arts

   

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

3rd grade

Advanced

47%

46%

47%

 

Proficient

50%

50%

51%

 

Below proficient

3%

4%

2%

         

4th grade

Advanced

26%

36%

50%

 

Proficient

58%

58%

44%

 

Below proficient

16%

6%

6%

         

5th grade

Advanced

33%

44%

52%

 

Proficient

56%

56%

48%

 

Below proficient

11%

0%

0%

         

6th grade

Advanced

32%

39%

40%

 

Proficient

62%

47%

57%

 

Below proficient

5%

14%

2%

         

7th grade

Advanced

22%

33%

37%

 

Proficient

57%

50%

47%

 

Below proficient

22%

17%

16%

         

8th grade

Advanced

32%

41%

44%

 

Proficient

57%

51%

47%

 

Below proficient

11%

7%

9%

 

Performance Levels for Math

   

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

3rd grade

Advanced

50%

50%

49%

 

Proficient

40%

42%

43%

 

Below proficient

10%

8%

9%

         

4th grade

Advanced

26%

19%

34%

 

Proficient

58%

64%

59%

 

Below proficient

16%

17%

6%

         

5th grade

Advanced

28%

41%

36%

 

Proficient

56%

54%

60%

 

Below proficient

17%

5%

4%

         

6th grade

Advanced

38%

47%

33%

 

Proficient

57%

44%

57%

 

Below proficient

5%

8%

10%

         

7th grade

Advanced

38%

25%

34%

 

Proficient

49%

61%

47%

 

Below proficient

14%

14%

18%

         

8th grade

Advanced

32%

32%

21%

 

Proficient

53%

46%

62%

Below proficient

15%

22%

18%



Performance Levels for Social Studies

   

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

3rd grade

Advanced

30%

35%

38%

 

Proficient

53%

54%

47%

 

Below proficient

17%

12%

15%

         

4th grade

Advanced

10%

28%

47%

 

Proficient

69%

56%

43%

 

Below proficient

21%

17%

13%

         

5th grade

Advanced

14%

21%

24%

 

Proficient

58%

62%

72%

 

Below proficient

28%

18%

4%

         

6th grade

Advanced

11%

17%

24%

 

Proficient

76%

69%

63%

 

Below proficient

14%

14%

12%

         

7th grade

Advanced

14%

14%

18%

 

Proficient

46%

56%

55%

 

Below proficient

41%

31%

26%

         

8th grade

Advanced

23%

20%

18%

 

Proficient

51%

49%

44%

 

Below proficient

26%

32%

38%

 

Performance Levels for Science

   

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

3rd grade

Advanced

13%

42%

38%

 

Proficient

80%

50%

55%

 

Below proficient

7%

8%

6%

         

4th grade

Advanced

24%

28%

44%

 

Proficient

60%

61%

44%

 

Below proficient

17%

11%

13%

         

5th grade

Advanced

11%

18%

24%

 

Proficient

58%

69%

60%

 

Below proficient

31%

13%

16%

         

6th grade

Advanced

24%

17%

32%

 

Proficient

68%

67%

66%

 

Below proficient

8%

17%

2%

         

7th grade

Advanced

8%

14%

24%

 

Proficient

59%

53%

42%

 

Below proficient

32%

33%

34%

         

8th grade

Advanced

19%

7%

26%

 

Proficient

53%

59%

44%

 

Below proficient

28%

34%

29%

Many observations can be made by reviewing the information concerning performance levels and the percentages of advanced students. In third grade, an increase in the number of advanced students can be seen in the subject areas of reading/language arts and social studies, while there is a slight decline in the number of advanced students in math and science. The fourth grade percentages maintained or increased in all subject areas except science. The fifth grade shows an increase in the number of advanced students in every subject area except math. The sixth grade remained steady or increased in every area with the exception of math. The seventh grade showed an increase in reading/language arts and social studies but showed a decrease in math and science. The eighth grade had a higher percentage of advanced students in math and science but a decreased number in reading/language arts and social studies.

Using this information, all grade levels showed an increase in the number of advanced students in reading/language arts. For math, grades four, five, and eight showed increases while grades three, six, and seven indicated slight decreases in advanced performance. In social studies, the number of advanced students in grades three through seven increased, but there was a 2% decline in the number of eighth-grade students. For science, there was an increase in the number of advanced students in grades four, five, six, seven, and eight.

TCAP Criterion Referenced Academic Achievement

Elkton teachers and all stakeholders study the state’s school report card to look for trends in strengths and areas of need. Using information given concerning criterion referenced academic achievement for three years, 2005, 2006, and 2007, several strengths can be noted.

Elkton students have continually raised the school’s math, reading/language arts, and social studies scores for each of the three years. While science had remained steady for the two previous years, students raised those scores in 2007.

Comparisons can be made using the state scores and grades. In 2005, Elkton was lower than the state scores in all subjects and the same as the state grades with the exception of a lower grade in reading/language. In 2006, students’ scores remained lower by one or two points than the state scores in all subjects. However, Elkton’s grades were on par with the state grades in every subject. In 2007, students’ scores continued to be one or two points lower than the state scores in all subject areas. In reading/language arts, Elkton’s report card grade is on par with the state grade, but the grades in math, science, and social studies remain one letter grade lower than the state.

This comparison of scores does indicate some strengths of the Elkton students. Even so, areas of concern still exist, especially to raise Elkton scores to the state level.

TVAAS – Value Added

In studying available TVAAS data, the Elkton faculty pays particular attention to gains and losses during the most recent three years of time. Numbers are studied to discover trends.

In reading/language arts, grades four, five, and seven show gains while grades six and eight show declines from 2006 to 2007. The Elkton three-year average compares to the state’s three-year average by grades five and eight being above the state average and grades four, six, and seven being below the state average.

For math, TVAAS data from 2006-2007 indicates a gain for grades four and five but a decline in scores at all other grade levels. When comparing the three-year averages, the fifth and sixth grades had averages above the state three-year average. All other grades were below the state average.

The 2006-2007 TVAAS data for social studies indicates increased scores for grades four, six, and seven with grades five and eight having declines. The three-year averages were above the state averages in grades five, six, and eight while grades four and seven were below the state averages.

Science TVAAS data points to an increase in scores at all grade levels except for grade five. Three-year averages are above the state average in the sixth and eighth grades while grades four, five, and seven are all below the state’s three-year average growth.

 

Kindergarten DIBELS Assessment Scores for 2006-2007

Assessment

Beginning

Middle

End

Initial Sound Fluency

 

91% established

6% emerging

3% deficient

 

Letter Naming Fluency

 

80% low risk

6% some risk

14% at risk

86% low risk

0% some risk

14% at risk

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

 

86% low risk

9% some risk

6% at risk

94% established

3% emerging

3% deficient

Nonsense Word Fluency

 

89% low risk

6% some risk

6% at risk

91% low risk

3% some risk

6% at risk

Elkton Elementary piloted Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) as an assessment for 2006-2007 kindergarten students. Due to the school districts late start, kindergarten students were given two tests instead of three. Gains were noted in all areas.

 

Component 2 – Beliefs, Common Mission, and Shared Vision

The Elkton School faculty and staff first began to develop a set of belief statements and a mission statement during the first steps towards SACS accreditation in 1990-1991. After that time, the beliefs and mission have been reviewed yearly by the committee assigned to that position. The committee then presents their findings to the faculty, staff, students, parents, and other stakeholders for approval and consensus.

During the 2001-2002 school year, the belief statements and mission were modified and reworded as necessary by the faculty and staff. Some new statements were added, and the mission statement was revised in order to make it more student-friendly. The newly reviewed beliefs and mission were mailed to a large membership group of the parents and community members. They were asked to present their findings in a work session at the school. That group presented several new ideas that were incorporated into the final list of beliefs and mission for that school year. One particularly memorable statement came from a community member asking that patriotism be addressed, especially because of the then-recent events of September 11, 2001. Consensus to accept that idea and all others was reached by the parent/community group. A presentation of the work of that group was given to the entire faculty and staff, at that time also reaching consensus. The beliefs and mission were presented to the entire student body. As a group, they made the mission statement a part of all student gatherings. The student body is still, in 2006, proud to show their involvement in the everyday presentation of the mission statement.

When beginning the thought process to develop a vision statement, all teachers and staff members were given information concerning the basic ideas of the development of a vision statement. All teachers, teaching assistants, secretaries, and custodians completed a form giving their thoughts on a vision statement. All statements were compiled and reviewed by the faculty and staff before presenting some of the possible vision statements to other stakeholders. Five favorite possibilities were presented to other stakeholders. From that list, the present vision statement was chosen by the faculty and staff. Later that statement was presented to students, parents, and other community members for their input. From this process came the present vision statement for Elkton School.

 

2.1: Beliefs, Common Mission, and Shared Vision

Beliefs

The Beliefs of Elkton Elementary School

1. Placed in the least restrictive environment and given an education that meets their needs, all children can learn.

2. For optimal growth and learning, students need to be provided with a safe learning environment that is emotionally and intellectually stimulating.

3. School staff, parents, and the community must collaborate and unite in order to provide maximum support for the learning environment.

4. Relationships that foster mutual respect between students and school staff will promote positive self-esteem and behavior.

5. Equipping students with problem solving and decision-making skills will lead them to become independent learners and contributing members of society.

6. High expectations and desire for quality work encourages students to work to the best of their ability.

7. The use of research-based data-driven instructional methods and assessments will maximize student achievement.

8. Continual reevaluation of programs, teaching methods, and uses of assessments to plan an effective curriculum will better prepare students for the future.

9. Through example and instruction, students will develop a strong sense of character, citizenship, and patriotism.

 

Common Mission

The mission of Elkton Elementary School is to provide a quality education so

all students may achieve yearly progress because

Effective Learning Kindles Success.

Shared Vision

It is the vision of Elkton School to provide every student with a quality experience that promotes community, respect, and achievement. Students, teachers, parents, and community members work together to enhance the opportunities that are available for all students. Together, we can!

 

Component 3 – Curricular, Instructional, Assessment, and Organizational Effectiveness

Template 3.1.a: Curricular Practices

(Rubric Indicators 3.1 and 3.2)

Current Curricular Practices

Use of the Tennessee Blueprint for Learning

Curriculum Mapping

Established Benchmarks

Literacy

Technology

Textbooks

Formative Assessments

Evidence of Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) 98% of the teachers surveyed said they use the state-approved curriculum 78% of the teachers surveyed said they use curriculum mapping 92% of teachers surveyed said that school and state benchmarks can be met 3-Tiered Reading is beginning to be put in practice in the lower grades; an assigned time for silent reading is part of the school day for upper grades. A newly equipped computer lab is in place. 100% of the students have necessary textbooks 100% of students in grades 2-8 take the Think Link/PAS test to help practice testing skills.
Is the current practice research-based? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Is it a principle & practice of high-performing schools? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Has the current practice been effective or ineffective? Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
What data source(s) do you have that support your answer? (identify all applicable sources) School Report Card School Report Card; TCAP reports School Report Card; AYP reports Teacher observations; student grades Teacher observations; records of computer lab use Teacher observations; student report cards; TCAP reports Reports from Think Link tests
Evidence of effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of quantifiable improvement) Improved test scores Improved test scores The school’s scores meet the benchmarks in all areas. With more of an emphasis on reading, teachers are seeing improved grades for most students. Using the Study Island Assessment program, the computer lab is effective in reinforcing academic skills. Teachers work regularly to coordinate curriculum standards with textbook information. Because the Think Link tests help to show areas of need for each student, teachers are able to specifically address those needs.
Evidence of equitable school support for this practice All academic classes make a real push toward the curriculum standards. All teachers have opportunities of common planning times to work with other teachers on curriculum mapping. Teachers are given copies of benchmark figures and the school’s scores to see achievement levels. Teachers reached consensus that a reading time must take place everyday. All students use the computer lab at least one hour each week. Every teacher can use the lab during any of the open times. All students have textbooks that are needed. All students in grades 2-8 participate in the Think Link testing program.
Next Step (changes or continuations) Continue this process of studying the curriculum and sharing ideas to adequately meet the needs of all students, especially those in the lower proficiency areas. Continue and expand on this process. As the curriculum is updated, teachers should make necessary changes to accommodate new curriculum standards. As the state benchmarks are raised, teachers must be ever mindful of curriculum requirements. Because the 3-tiered reading program is just beginning in lower grades, it should be expanded there. Teachers should then share ideas during professional development times concerning reading instruction. Expand the use of the computer lab. Teachers should better coordinate academic needs with the computer instructor for reinforcement in the computer lab. As new textbooks are adopted, teachers must match curriculum needs with resources available with textbooks. Teachers must also continue to search for materials that supplement textbooks. Teachers should become more aware of the information available from the Think Link reports. Ideas for using this information should be shared among the faculty during professional development times.

 

Curriculum Gap Analysis - Narrative Response Required
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How are we currently allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality curricular practices?)

·1 TIME – Elkton School teachers consider the Tennessee Curriculum standards as the basis for student learning. All work is based on the SPIs. All faculty and staff spend time ensuring that each student is included in the general curriculum. Curriculum mapping is evident in the classrooms. Curriculum options and new resources that could be beneficial to our students are discussed during professional development activities. Teachers are encouraged to use their planning time as a means of communicating with teachers and a means of curricular planning.

·2 MONEY – The principal is the distributor of funds at Elkton School; therefore, funds are used cautiously but wisely. When monies are requested by a teacher, a thorough investigation is launched by the principal concerning the long-term benefits to the curriculum. Each department is given an allocated amount to spend.

·3 PERSONNEL – The state standards are followed by all personnel at Elkton School. Strong curriculum support is evident by the strong dedication from the educational assistants, special education department, gifted instructors, and new computer lab facilitator. All of these have proven to provide extra help and support for, not only students with disabilities but all students, through their dedication in implementing the curriculum.

·4 OTHER RESOURCES – Elkton School relies heavily on its community and its members as valuable sources to the curriculum.

“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How should we be allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality curricular practices?)

·1 TIME – Overall, the time for planning is spent wisely. However, more grade-level planning in the upper grades could prove beneficial.

·2 MONEY – The Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO) allocates $50.00 per teacher each semester for instructional materials. The county allocates $200.00 per teacher each year for instructional materials.

·3 PERSONNEL – There is adequate personnel at Elkton School. However, the school is in need of an art teacher. Also, a full-time at-risk coach would greatly help strengthen some weaker curricular areas for some students.

·4 OTHER RESOURCES – The faculty should continue to explore new research-based curricular materials and methods. The teachers should continue to incorporate community and its resources into the curriculum.

Equity and Adequacy:

Are we providing equity and adequacy to all of our teachers?

Yes. Teachers have ample planning time, sufficient professional development, and good curriculum guides.

Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective with all their students?

Yes. Funds and resources are used in a cautious but wise manner.

Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the needs of all students in our school?

Yes. Based on AYP and the school report card, the school is doing an adequate job, but there is room for improvement.

 

Template 3.1.c: Curricular Summary Questions

(Rubric Indicator 3.2)

Curriculum Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major strengths and how do we know?

- The curriculum is taught by 100% highly qualified teachers.

- The staff is stronger with the addition of a computer lab facilitator.

- Teachers continue to evaluate test data and make plans for improvements.

 

Curriculum Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major challenges and how do we know. (These should be stated as curricular practice challenges identified in the templates above, that could be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in component 1.)

- Additional professional development could help teachers be more familiar with the state curriculum and especially as it relates to needs of students in the lower proficiency areas.

Curriculum Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
How will we address our challenges?

-Work should be done to continue upgrades in technology throughout the school to accommodate changes in the curriculum and to meet the needs of the students.

- Curriculum mapping should be expanded vertically and horizontally.

 

Template 3.2.a: Instructional Practices

(Rubric Indicators 3.3 and 3.4)

Current Instructional Practices

Differentiated

Instruction

Supplemental

Instructional

Programs

Use of

Technology

School and

Community-wide

Activities

Continuous

Re-evaluation

And modification

Of instructional

programs

Classroom

Organization/

Knowledge

Application

Additional Classroom Materials to Supplement Adopted Textbooks

Evidence of Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) Use of the following: language tracking folders; lectures; Power Point; audio lessons; video lessons; hands-on activities/experiments; cross-curricular instruction; cooperative learning; projects; skills using library books; manipulatives; multiple intelligence activities Use of the following: OT/ PT/Speech/

language instruction; Title I Reading and Math;

At-Risk instructor; tutoring programs; QUEST;

Pre-K; field trips; food cart; Ag-in-the-

Classroom; computer instruction; teaching assistants; AR used to reinforce teaching

Use of the following: Power Point; calculators; audio/vide/

CD/laser discs presentations; United Streaming; computer classes

Participation in the following: school spelling bee; school-wide science fair; scholastic bowl; essay, poetry, and art contests; Volksmarch; class assembly programs, school-wide assembly programs Use of the following: curriculum mapping; Tennessee Blueprint for Learning; teacher collaboration. Use of Think Link and DIBELS reports to reevaluate and change instructional programs. Participation in the following: Silent Sustained Reading (SSR); peer tutoring; shared reading; conferences with students; one-on-one instruction; small-group instruction Most teachers surveyed and observed use additional materials to supplement adopted textbooks.
Is the current practice research-based? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Is it a principle & practice of high-performing schools? Yes; listed in “Schools to Watch Yes; listed in “Schools to Watch” Yes; listed in “Schools to Watch” Yes; listed in “Schools to Watch” Yes; listed in

“Schools to Watch”

Yes; listed in “Schools to Watch” Yes
Has the current practice been effective or ineffective? Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
What data source(s) do you have that support your answer? (identify all applicable sources) Reports from TCAP, Think Link, Gateway, DIBELS, surveys Reports from TCAP, Think Link, Gateway, DIBELS, surveys Reports from TCAP, Think Lind, Gateway, DIBELS, surveys Participation numbers of the amount of student involvement Reports from TCAP, Think Link, DIBELS, Gateway, and surveys Reports from TCAP, Think Link, DIBELS, and Gateway Teacher observations and interviews
Evidence of effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of quantifiable improvement) Surveys show that 91% of the faculty feels students are provided with multiple opportunities to succeed. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, 100% of algebra students passed the Algebra Gateway. Surveys show

that 80% of faculty feels they have the proper support from administration and staff members. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, 100% of algebra students passed the Algebra Gateway.

Surveys show that 65% of the faculty feel students are highly engaged in technology activities. In 2005, 2006, 2007, 100% of algebra students passed the Algebra Gateway. 100% participation in class assembly programs and school-wide assembly programs. Spelling bees held in every 3-5 classroom to determine representatives in the school spelling bee where 48 students represented grades 3-8. Science Fair participation required in grades 4-8; other grades chose to participate, with 100% participating in ’06-’07. In the Scholastic Bowl, 10 students from grades 7-8 represent the school. Students in grades 7-8 submit poetry, submit essays for Farm Bureau, Elkton Historical Society, and VFW, and participate in the Elkton Volksmarch. Surveys show 78% of teachers use curriculum mapping, 100% use Tennessee Blueprint, and 96% feel teaching and learning materials are correlated to state standards and distributed to the instructional staff. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, 100% of algebra

students passed the Algebra Gateway.

In 2005, 2006, and 2007, 100% of algebra students passed the Algebra Gateway. Improved student grades often result from the use of additional materials be used supplement the adopted textbooks.
Evidence of equitable school support for this practice In-service has been conducted on interpreting and using TCAP scores, using Think Link results, using United Streaming, and high-performing schools. All students in K-8 have access to these programs, as appropriate for need or age. In-service has been provided on some programs, such as TNCEP. In-service has been offered on the use of Power Point and United Streaming. All teachers have at least one working computer in their classroom. All teachers and students have access to the computer lab. School-wide opportunities and participation in community activities All teachers have a copy of the Tennessee Blueprint, a daily planning time, and access to TCAP, Think Link, and DIBELS scores. SSR is a school-wide activity. All teachers are willing to help students one-on-one or offer peer tutoring. Teachers often conference with students. All teachers have available funding for purchase of supplemental materials. Supplies are available in the school to make supplemental material.
Next Step (changes or continuations) Continue the use of differentiated instruction. Request in-service on addressing and meeting the needs of multiple intelligences in the classroom. Continue the use to the supplemental programs. Continue to find more opportunities to use supplemental instruction. Expand the use of technology. Encourage all teachers to utilize available technology. Continue present activities. Encourage more student participation in school-sponsored activities. Continue the present reevaluation and modification of programs. Encourage more teachers to implement the use of Think Link or DIBELS results to evaluate instruction. Continue the present activities. Encourage teachers not fully using these programs

To implement them into their instruction.

As new textbooks are adopted, teachers must study and share with each other ideas concerning supplemental material.

 

Template 3.2.b: Instructional Gap Analysis

Instructional Gap Analysis - Narrative Response Required
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How are we currently allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality instructional practices?)

·5 TIME – Time has been allocated for planned in-service activities.

·6 MONEY – Instructional money is allocated from the Central Office, the budget is made for the money to be used by the school, and the Instructional Budget Committee of Elkton School reviews and approves the budget.

·7 PERSONNEL – All teachers are “highly qualified” using the guidelines of NCLB. Elkton School has two teachers per grade level to serve students and maintain student/teacher ratio below the state average. There are four full-time teachers for library, music, guidance, and physical education. There are two full-time assistants who serve grades K-1 and grades 2-3.

·8 OTHER RESOURCES – One community volunteer assists one day each week, especially for grades 4-8. Other resources providing instructional services for the school are parent volunteers, members of the Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO), and other volunteers from area churches and civic organizations.

“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How should we be allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality instructional practices?)

·5 TIME – More professional development should be focused on the individual needs of the school.

·6 MONEY – Funds from teacher accounts should be more accessible for teachers to spend at a variety of locations and school supply stores to provide the best equipment for each teacher’s instructional day.

·7 PERSONNEL – A full-time art teacher is needed at Elkton School.

·8 OTHER RESOURCES – More parent involvement would be greatly helpful.

Equity and Adequacy:

Are we providing equity and adequacy to all of our teachers? Yes; all teachers have access to the same funds, resources, time, supplies, etc.

Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective with all their students? Yes; all materials and funds are distributed equally.

Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the needs of all students in our school? No; as if often the case in education, Elkton School seems to meet the needs of the middle students while often not completely addressing the needs of the high and low achieving students.

 

Template 3.2.c: Instructional Summary Questions

(Rubric Indicator 3.4)

Instructional Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major strengths and how do we know?

There are several instructional strengths of Elkton School. Information about the strengths come from observations, surveys, and interviews of teachers and students.

-Most teachers are willing to help students outside of regular class time.

-Most classes have student/teacher ratios smaller than required by state guidelines.

-There is a fully-equipped computer lab.

-A high percentage of teachers hold a Master’s Degree or higher.

-All of the teachers are considered “highly qualified” by NCLB qualifications.

-There are before- and after-school sessions for tutoring and enrichment.

-There is a Quest class for gifted students.

 

Instructional Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major challenges and how do we know. (These should be stated as instructional practice challenges identified in the templates above, that could be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in component 1.)

- Through teacher interviews, we know that we must often supplement adopted material in order to adequately address curriculum standards.

- Addition use of diverse instructional methods should be used.

Instructional Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
How will we address our challenges?

- During professional development sessions, curriculum standards should be addressed. Instructional strategies to address those standards should be shared and discussed among the faculty.

- Teachers should learn about and expand the use of technology for instruction.

 

Template 3.3.a: Assessment Practices

(Rubric Indicators 3.5 and 3.6)

Current Assessment Practices

TCAP,

Including

Writing

Assessment

DIBELS

Think Link

Accelerated

Reading

Classroom

Assessment

Brigance

Screening/

Referral

Testing and

Evaluation

Evidence of Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) State-required

testing program

State-required testing program 100% of the students in grades 1-8 participate in the Think Link assessment program. This school-wide program may be used by all students. Teacher interviews; classroom observations show a wide variety of assessment practices. Assessment used especially in K-1. Screening is done upon referral from the classroom teacher
Is the current practice research-based? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Is it a principle & practice of high-performing schools? Yes; participation is in schools throughout Tennessee Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Has the current practice been effective or ineffective? Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
What data source(s) do you have that support your answer? (identify all applicable sources) Numerous reports are produced by TCAP data. More information is gathered through TVAAS data. Because of the short amount of time that the program has been in place, there is only a small amount of data available. Reports from the Think Link tests; TCAP reports Student reports of scores for A.R. points Student report cards; TCAP reports Interview with teachers; scores from the assessment Individual screening and testing results
Evidence of effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of quantifiable improvement) Improvements in AYP scores At this time, this new assessment appears to be effective. The administrative and teacher reports indicate to teachers areas of the curriculum to be strengthened. This supplemental program is used to encourage reading. Classroom assessment helps students and teachers know skills that must be reinforced. Teachers use information from this assessment to help students, especially in areas of weaknesses. Teachers use this type of assessment to assist in finding the best help for the referred students
Evidence of equitable school support for this practice All students in grades 2-8 participate in TCAP testing. Much support for this program comes from the county level. All students in grades 2-8 participate. All students are able to participate in A.R. reading. All students and teachers participate in some type of classroom evaluation. This assessment would be used for all students in the specified grade level. All students are eligible for any necessary screening.
Next Step (changes or continuations) Continue the use of the state-mandated testing program and the use of reports connected with this assessment. Continue the use of the DIBELS assessment to develop a useable data base. Continue this assessment process for language arts, math, and science. Consider adding social studies as a part of the assessment. Continue the use of this supplemental program. Expand the list of books available to scored. Continue evaluation of students, but expand and vary the types of evaluation. Continue the use of this assessment. Continue this process.

 

Template 3.3.b: Assessment Gap Analysis

Assessment Gap Analysis – Narrative Response Required
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How are we currently allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality assessment practices?)

·9 TIME – For many years, the faculty and staff at Elkton School have spent many hours collaboratively analyzing and discussing TCAP test scores, writing assessment scores, DIBELS, Brigance testing, Think Link tests, state report cards, and TVAAS data. TCAP scores are examined by both faculty and staff and feedback is given on areas of strength and weaknesses. A sample writing test is given prior to the writing assessment test. Time is spent providing students with previous assessments from the state web page, and sample prompts are given as practice in class. Time is spent by the kindergarten teachers on DIBELS practice and Brigance testing. Teachers invest time in evaluating student progress on the three Think Link assessments given prior to TCAP testing. The results are shared in class with the students, and the areas of weakness become the focus of improvement. The state report card is announced to the faculty, staff, and students by the principal. The principal spends an adequate amount of time discussing the TVAAS data with each individual teacher.

·10 MONEY – Elkton School has used its funds to purchase TCAP coaching workbooks for seventh- and eighth-grade science. A Study Island membership has been purchased for reading/language arts and math. School funds are also used to purchase the Think Link assessments for reading/language arts, math, and science.

·11 PERSONNEL – An at-risk coach was assigned to Elkton School for a total of seven weeks to work with students who were deficient in the areas of reading and math according to 2006-2007 TCAP scores. All faculty and staff attend professional development days centering on test analysis.

·12 OTHER RESOURCES – Elkton School uses other resources for assessment purposes. The Accelerated Reader program scores are averaged as a portion of the students’ reading grades. Teachers use weekly and/or chapter tests as only one means of assessment.

“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How should we be allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality assessment practices?)

·9 TIME – More time should be spent collaborating with the grade-level teachers. Time should be spent examining the newly funded software, including Study Island, designed to help target specific SPIs.

·10 MONEY – Currently, funds are not used to purchase the Think Link Assessment or Study Island membership for social studies. These purchases should be considered for the next school year.

·11 PERSONNEL – The school needs an at-risk coach for more than the allotted seven weeks.

·12 OTHER RESOURCES – Lack of funds is always a deficiency. There are many resources that could be purchased, but funds are not always available.

Equity and Adequacy:

Are we providing equity and adequacy to all of our teachers?

Yes. All teachers have the same opportunities of professional development training concerning test analysis.

Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective with all their students?

Yes. Elkton School is currently meeting the needs of all teachers with the variety of resources offered, including the TCAP practice workbooks, Study Island assessment program, and the county-funded United Streaming program.

Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the needs of all students in our school?

Yes. Elkton School is meeting the needs of all students in assessment. However, the faculty continues to strive for improvement and explore the opportunities that are made available to the teachers that will strengthen each student academically.


Template 3.3.c: Assessment Summary Questions

(Rubric Indicator 3.6)

Assessment Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major strengths and how do we know?

- Annual Open House designed for teaching the parents about AYP, test analysis, SPIs, and a variety of other assessment information.

- Instruction is aligned with assessments, and assessments are aligned with state standards.

- Elkton School is in “good standing” based on NCLB requirements.

 

Assessment Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major challenges and how do we know. (These should be stated as assessment practice challenges identified in the templates above, that could be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in component 1.)

- Data indicates that students with disabilities typically score lower than other subgroups.

- Students scoring as advanced are not consistently showing gains.

- Students in grade 7 and 8 are not scoring well on the TCAP tests.

Assessment Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
How will we address our challenges?

During the 2008-2009 school year, the Think Link Assessment will be given in social studies. In addition, the social studies portion of the Study Island software will be purchased to aid in raising test scores.

 

Template 3.4.a: Organizational Practices

(Rubric Indicators 3.7and 3.8)

Current Organizational Practices

Use of School’s Mission Statement

Community/ Parent Involvement

Curriculum

Professional Development/

In-service

School Safety

Faculty and Staff Committees

Student Organizations

Evidence of Practice (State in definitive/tangible terms) The school’s mission statement and beliefs are included in the school’s website, the monthly newsletter, and on other communications. The school’s mission and beliefs are display throughout the building. The mission is read every morning during announcements. Surveys; school report card; PTO involvement; Elkton Historical Society; First National Bank; People’s Bank; D.A.R.E. program; Prospect United Methodist Church; Grandparents’ Day; Book Fairs Students in all academic classes are exposed to the requirements as listed in the state curriculum. 100% of faculty and staff members participate in professional development. Safety committee in place; drills practiced regularly. 100% of faculty and staff members are assigned to a committee. Committees vary as according to needs or responsibilities. Numerous student organizations: sport teams, Student Council, Beta Club
Is the current practice research-based? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Is it a principle & practice of high-performing schools? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Has the current practice been effective or ineffective? Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
What data source(s) do you have that support your answer? (identify all applicable sources) Surveys and observations of students Records of attendance and participation Teacher surveys and observations Teacher surveys Records in office List of committees and members on file with principal. Records of participation
Evidence of effectiveness or ineffectiveness (State in terms of quantifiable improvement) Surveys and observations indicate that 100% of the students know and understand the mission statement. Records indicate good parent and community participation. 100% of academic teachers expose students to curriculum requirements. 100% of Elkton faculty and staff participate in professional development activities. Drills become more and more efficient. Principal would have on file the effectiveness of each committee. Organizations are open to all but then must meet qualifications
Evidence of equitable school support for this practice For the use of the mission statement, there is 100% participation throughout the school. All have opportunities to participate. All students and teachers use the same state curriculum. Professional development activities are open to all teachers. All faculty, staff, and students participate in safety drills. All have opportunities to participate. All students are given opportunities to participate
Next Step (changes or continuations) Continue the present uses of the mission statement. A change to make would be to include the mission on all correspondence, especially from the school office. Incorporate more activities to involve parents. Consider rewarding parent involvement with a banquet or awards program. Continue to use all state curriculum components. Investigate addition activities that will be school-specific according to particular school needs. Continue to promote safety and practice drills. Continue to assign all faculty and staff members to committees for a sense of responsibility. Continue to promote student organizations to help involve students and their families in school activities.

 

Template 3.4.b: Organizational Gap Analysis

Organizational Gap Analysis – Narrative Response Required
“What is” The Current Use of: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How are we currently allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality organizational practices?)

·13 TIME – Time is allotted for all activities, with class time being protected for instruction.

·14 MONEY – Records of funds for sporting events, student clubs, and the PTO are kept and by allocated as is necessary.

·15 PERSONNEL – Personnel are assigned to committees according to needs and interests.

·16 OTHER RESOURCES – Community support is always apparent in time of fund raising events and sports events.

“What Ought to Be” – How Should we be Using Our: TIME, MONEY, PERSONNEL And OTHER RESOURCES

(How should we be allocating our time, money, personnel and other resources and building capacity around understanding and implementing high quality organizational practices?)

·13 TIME – All teachers and students should be made aware of other classes instruction times.

·14 MONEY – Funds should continue to be monitored.

·15 PERSONNEL – Personnel should be assigned different organizational tasks as needs and interest change.

·16 OTHER RESOURCES – There is always a place for more parent and community involvement.

Equity and Adequacy:

Are we providing equity and adequacy to all of our teachers?

Yes. All teachers have opportunities to take on leadership roles in the organizational practices of the school.

Are we targeting funds and resources effectively to meet the needs of all of our teachers in being effective with all their students?

Yes. With available funds and resources, the faculty and staff of Elkton School do their very best in the organizational practices of the school to best meet the needs of the students.

Based on the data, are we accurately meeting the needs of all students in our school?

Yes. However, there is always room for improvement. Very few activities are held after school because of transportation concerns.

 

Template 3.4.c: Organization Summary Questions

(Rubric Indicator 3.8)

Organization Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major strengths and how do we know?

- All students have opportunities to participate in the activities of the school.

- The organizational practices of Elkton School are set up with regard to student instruction as being the number one activity.

 

Organization Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
What are our major challenges and how do we know. (These should be stated as organizational practice challenges identified in the templates above, that could be a cause of the prioritized needs identified in component 1.)

- Being a small rural school makes transportation for after-school activities difficult for some students.

- As is true in most schools, there are some faculty members who are more involved in activities than others.

 

 

 

Organization Summary Questions- Narrative Response Required
How will we address our challenges?

- Teachers consistently find ways for students to be involved in school activities.

- Teachers should be encouraged to protect the instructional time.

 

GOAL 1 – Action Plan Development

Template 4.1 (Rubric Indicator 4.1) Revised DATE: May 1, 2008

Section A –Describe your goal and identify which need(s) it addresses. (Remember that your previous components identified the strengths and challenges/needs.)

Goal

Students will score in the proficient to advanced range on the TCAP math test during each school year beginning with the 2008-2009 school year, with emphasis on moving from the proficient to the advanced range.

Which need(s) does this Goal address?

This goal is set in response to data reported in SIP Component 1B, Academic and Non-academic Data, found on page _____.

How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?

This goal is the same as the system goal listed in the five-year plan.

ACTION STEPS – Template 4.2 (Rubric Indicator 4.2)

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Template 4.3 (Rubric Indicator 4.3)

Section C – For each of the Action Steps you list, give timeline, person(s) responsible, projected cost(s)/required resources, funding sources, evaluation strategy and performance results/outcomes. (For Evaluation Strategy, define how you will evaluate the action step.)

Timeline

Person(s) Responsible

Required Resources

Projected Cost(s) & Funding Sources

Evaluation Strategy

Performance Results / Outcomes

Action Step

One

Think Link/PAS test will be given each year to help students practice test-taking skills prior to the TCAP test and to assist teachers in evaluating the progress of students and the effectiveness of math instruction in grades 1-8.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports of test results will be given to each teacher soon after each testing session.

School administrator Bob Polly; classroom math teachers

Test manuals and answer sheets for each student

Approximately $10.75 per student each year provided with school general fund

Teacher use of testing results to assist in lesson planning according to skills in need of additional instruction; administrator will monitor use of testing results by teacher and student test scores

Step

Two

Software that accompanies adopted math series will be utilized in the computer lab to increase math competency.

Fall of 2007 through spring 2011; to be reviewed at the end of each semester by teachers for effectiveness

Grade-level math teachers coordinating with Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

Software and computer lab

No costs; provided with textbook materials

Computer Lab Facilitator will provide teachers with reports of skills progress

Action Step

Two

Software that accompanies adopted math series will be utilized in the computer lab to increase math competency.

Fall of 2007 through spring 2011; to be reviewed at the end of each semester by teachers for effectiveness

Grade-level math teachers coordinating with Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

No costs; provided with textbook materials


Computer Lab Facilitator will provide teachers with reports of skills progress

 

 

 

Action Step

Three

Students targeted through test score evaluations will work with a county-wide At-Risk coach for thirty-five days, working in small groups and individually for thirty minute sessions daily to increase math competency.

Winter 2008 through spring 2009; weekly updates will be given to classroom teachers

Janet Rose, At-Risk Coach, coordinating with math teachers

Unused classroom space

County provided personnel and appropriate materials

The At-Risk team, coordinated by Sue Whittemore, will evaluate the effectiveness of the project comparing 2007 and 2008 test score results

Action Step

Four

Study Island Assessment Preparation Program will be used to improve math skills in areas identified by classroom math teachers coordinating with the Computer Lab Facilitator.

January 2008 through June 2009; written reports generated by the program will be provided to teachers after each skill is completed

Classroom math teachers; Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

Computer lab; Study Island program

$1477.00; state funds awarded through At-Risk Project

Targeted skills will be evaluated by examining relevant TCAP subtest scores

Action Step Five

Teachers with expertise using AIMS (Activities Integrating Math and Science) will help to teach faculty and staff to implement these activities as part of their math instruction.

Winter 2008 through spring 2009; use of activities will be reported in surveys at the end of each semester

AIMS trained teachers

AIMS materials and instructions

$500.00 - $1000; school general fund for supplies

Teacher observation; student assessment after each activity; monitoring of TCAP scores; completed survey forms

Action Step Six

Teachers should demonstrate use of the food cart provided by the Tennessee Nutrition and Consumer Education Program as used especially for math situations involving measurement.

Summer 2008; use of activities will be in surveys at the end of each semester

Kristy Butler, Jennifer Wilsford, Elizabeth May

TNCEP Food Cart; food

$25.00 - $50.00; school general fund for demonstration purposes

Teacher reports using surveys at the end of each presentation; evaluating TCAP subtest scores relating to measurement

Action Step Seven

Organized class competitions across the grade levels beginning with timed tests for basic facts and increasing difficulty to include practical applications and word problems.

Fall 2007 through spring 2008 in grades 1-3; Fall 2008 through spring 2009 in grades 4-8; competition results will be announced in school newsletters

Grade-level math chairpersons

Timer

No cost

Teacher evaluation; reports made at faculty meetings at least once per semester; evaluation of math TCAP scores

 

GOAL 2 – Action Plan Development

Template 4.1 (Rubric Indicator 4.1) Revised DATE: May 1, 2008

Section A –Describe your goal and identify which need(s) it addresses. (Remember that your previous components identified the strengths and challenges/needs.)

Goal

Students will score in the proficient or advanced range on the TCAP social studies test during each school year beginning with 2008-2009, with emphasis on moving students from the proficient to the advanced range.

Which need(s) does this Goal address?

This goal is set in place to address the need concerning social studies improvement as identified in data reported in SIP component 1B, Academic and Nonacademic Data found on page ______.

How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?

This goal is the same as the system goal listed in the five-year plan.

ACTION STEPS – Template 4.2 (Rubric Indicator 4.2)

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Template 4.3 (Rubric Indicator 4.3)

Section C – For each of the Action Steps you list, give timeline, person(s) responsible, projected cost(s)/required resources, funding sources, evaluation strategy and performance results/outcomes. (For Evaluation Strategy, define how you will evaluate the action step.)

Timeline

Person(s) Responsible

Required Resources

Projected Cost(s) & Funding Sources

Evaluation Strategy

Performance Results / Outcomes

Action Step One

Teachers will continue development of a social studies scope and sequence for each grading period.

Developed in July 2007 through August 2007; to be reviewed in summer 2008 and at the end of each grading period by social studies teachers for effectiveness

Grade-level social studies chairpersons with the assistance of Kelley Deason and Angela Mayes

Time for collaborative planning

No cost

Grade-level meetings will include planning sessions for upcoming goals and objectives according to state curriculum

Action Step

Two

Teachers will use United Streaming videos and the corresponding information to reinforce grade-level social studies objectives.

August 2008 through May 2009; each user will keep a log to be turned in at the end of the semester

Betty Ford, system-wide technology specialist; Connie Walls, school United Streaming contact

Time for collaborative planning

$9,284.00 per year for county license; from county funds for continued purchase of the United Streaming license

Teacher observations; monitoring student assessments showing comprehension of topics

Action Step Three

Teachers will provide and share ideas concerning activities to help implement the social studies curriculum in the form of mini-lessons to be presented to other teachers during professional development sessions.

January 2008 through August 2008; to be presented during professional development sessions; survey use of ideas throughout the school year

Classroom teachers; Rita McDonald, coordinator of school’s professional development

Time for collaborative planning

No cost

Observations of school administrator, Bob Polly; teacher observations of lessons; survey use of new ideas in the classrooms

Action Step Four

Students will read and be read nonfiction and historical fiction books that are cohesive with the social studies curriculum.

Use through spring semester 2009; monitor student comprehension after each completed book

Classroom teachers; Carol Abernathy, librarian

Appropriate

Books

No cost; use of library books or free trade books

Monitor TCAP scores in social studies and reading; monitor regular classroom assessments for comprehension of books read; use of Accelerated Reader computerized comprehension tests

 

Action Step Five

Using the computer lab, students will research social studies topics using Internet sites in order to enhance the social studies curriculum.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; survey sites used at the end of each grading period

Classroom teachers; Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

Computer lab;

No cost

Monitor TCAP scores for indications of improvement; monitor regular classroom assessments for indications of improved social studies grades

Action Step Six

Study Island State Assessment Preparation Program will be used to improve social studies skills in grades seven and eight.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; skills reports provided to teachers generated by the Study Island Program documenting student mastery of targeted skills

Terrance Cross, social studies teacher; Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

Computer Lab; Study Island program

$145.00 per grade level

Monitor Think Link/PAS test results of targeted skills; monitor TCAP sores in relevant subtests

Action Step Seven

Teachers will explore various projects, field trips, and resource persons to enhance the social studies curriculum.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; teachers will report projects in written form

Social studies teachers; Carol Abernathy, librarian

Internet access

Cost will vary for each activity; PTO funding and student contributions; school general fund

Teacher observation and reports of projects; monitor TCAP test scores

Action Step Eight

Think Link/PAS tests will be given each year to help students practice test-taking skills prior to the TCAP tests and to help teachers evaluate the progress of students.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports of test results will be given to teachers soon after each testing session

Classroom social studies teachers; Bob Polly, school administrator

Test manuals and answer sheets for each student

Approximately $10.75 per student each school year

Teacher use of testing results to assist in lesson planning with adjustments being made to accommodate for skill needs, administration will evaluate test effectiveness

 

GOAL 3 – Action Plan Development

Template 4.1 (Rubric Indicator 4.1) Revised DATE: May 1, 2008

Section A –Describe your goal and identify which need(s) it addresses. (Remember that your previous components identified the strengths and challenges/needs.)

Goal

Students will score in the proficient or advanced range on the TCAP science test during each school year, with advancements being made in the 2008-2009 school year.

Which need(s) does this Goal address?

This goal is set in place to address the need concerning science improvement as listed in SIP Component 1B, Academic and Non-Academic Data, found on page ______.

How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan?

ACTION STEPS – Template 4.2 (Rubric Indicator 4.2)

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – Template 4.3 (Rubric Indicator 4.3)

Section C – For each of the Action Steps you list, give timeline, person(s) responsible, projected cost(s)/required resources, funding sources, evaluation strategy and performance results/outcomes. (For Evaluation Strategy, define how you will evaluate the action step.)

Timeline

Person(s) Responsible

Required Resources

Projected Cost(s) & Funding Sources

Evaluation Strategy

Performance Results / Outcomes

Action Step One

Teachers will use United Streaming videos and presentations along with the corresponding information to reinforce the science curriculum and science objectives in grades K-8.

August 2008 through May 2009; use to be reported each semester in survey form

Grade-level science teachers; Betty Ford, system-wide technology specialist; Connie Walls, school United Streaming contact

$9,284.00 per year for county license; from county funds for continued purchase of the United Streaming license

Teacher observations; student assessments showing comprehension of topics

Action Step Two

Teachers will create a science scope and sequence for each grading period.

Developed in summer 2007; review at the end of each grading period for effectiveness; full review in the summer of 2008

Grade-level science chairpersons; Kristy Butler, teacher resource contact

Time for collaborative planning

 

No cost

Grade-level meetings will include planning sessions for upcoming goals and objectives according to the state curriculum

Action Step Two

Teachers will create a science scope and sequence for each grading period.

Developed in summer 2007; review at the end of each grading period for effectiveness; full review in the summer of 2008

Grade-level science chairpersons; Kristy Butler, teacher resource contact

No cost

Grade-level meetings will include planning sessions for upcoming goals and objectives according to the state curriculum

Action Step Three

Teachers will implement AIMS (Activities Integrating Math and Science) activities to teach and enhance the science curriculum.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; use of activities will be reported in surveys

Classroom science teachers; Claudia Davis, teacher resource contact

 

AIMS instructional materials

$500.00-$1000.00 from general fund for supplies for activities; $100.00 per year for each teacher provided by the PTO

Teacher observation; assessments after each activity; monitor TCAP scores

Action Step Four

Science projects and experiments will be showcased throughout the school for classes to share with various grade levels and with parent and community groups.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports about the projects and experiments will be presented in the school’s monthly newsletter

Classroom science teachers; Nadine Herrington, school teacher contact

 

Tables for displays

No cost

Teacher observation; monitor student discussion concerning projects and experiments

Action Step Five

Think Link/PAS tests will be given each year to help students practice test-taking skills prior to the TCAP tests and to help teachers evaluate the progress of students.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports of test results will be given to teachers soon after each testing session

Classroom science teachers; Bob Polly, school administrator

Test manuals and answer sheets for each student

Approximately $10.75 per student each school year

Teacher use of testing results to assist in lesson planning with adjustments being made to accommodate for skill needs; administration will evaluate test effectiveness

Action Step Five

Think Link/PAS tests will be given each year to help students practice test-taking skills prior to the TCAP tests and to help teachers evaluate the progress of students.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; reports of test results will be given to teachers soon after each testing session

Classroom science teachers; Bob Polly, school administrator

Approximately $10.75 per student each school year

Teacher use of testing results to assist in lesson planning with adjustments being made to accommodate for skill needs; administration will evaluate test effectiveness

Action Step Six

Using the computer lab, students will research science topics using Internet sites that enhance the science curriculum in grades seven and eight.

Winter 2008 through spring 2009; survey sites used at the end of the grading period

Nadine Herrington, seventh- and eighth-grade science teacher; Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

Computer lab

No cost

Monitor TCAP scores for indications of improvements; monitor regular classroom assessments for indications of improved science grades

Action Step Seven

More community, area-wide, state-wide, and surrounding area resources will be used to bring programs for whole-school and classroom presentations to help enhance and reinforce the science curriculum.

Continue through spring of 2009; report effectiveness of each presentation at its conclusion

Bob Polly, school administrator; Carol Abernathy, librarian

Internet access

No cost for presentations by volunteers; $500.00 from school’s general funds set aside to pay possible expenses

Monitor classroom discussions for understanding; monitor TCAP scores for indications of improvement

Action Step Eight

Study Island State Assessment Preparation Program will be used to improve science skills in grades seven and eight.

Fall 2008 through spring 2009; skills reports provided to teachers generated by the Study Island Program documenting student mastery of targeted skills

Nadine Herrington, science teacher; Sandra McCullough, computer lab facilitator

Computer lab and Study Island progam

$145.00 per grade level

Monitor Think Link/PAS test results of targeted skills; monitor TCAP scores in relevant subtests

 

TEMPLATE 5.1: Process Evaluation

(Rubric Indicator 5.1)

Evidence of Collaborative Process – Narrative response required
What evidence do we have that shows that a collaborative process was used throughout the entire planning process?

At the end of the 2006-2007 school year, the school improvement leadership team selected individuals to serve as component chairs, team members, and stakeholders for each TSIPP component. At a faculty meeting, the school improvement leadership team presented information concerning TSIPP component information, the use of the rubrics, team and group expectations, and a timeline. At the end of the meeting, component chairs met with their team for a planning session.

During the 2007-2008 professional development activities, the school improvement leadership team planned activities where all involved in the TSIPP process worked collaboratively and discussed concerns, asked questions, and set a deadline for the final project. Chairpersons from each component gave updates on each teams’ progress.

At the beginning of the 2007-2008 school year, chairs began notifying their teams of monthly or bimonthly meetings through morning announcements or through the school’s e-mailed announcements. A member from the school improvement leadership team was in attendance at each meeting. At each meeting, team members were expected to be present, take notes, and be an active participant.

All faculty and staff members had a voice in the planning process.

Evidence of Alignment of Data and Goals – Narrative response required
What evidence do we have that proves alignment between our data and our goals?

Much time and effort has been placed on carefully aligning our data with our goals. However, student progress determines changes that will be made. Teachers review and analyze data daily to determine if gains are being made. In each goal, emphasis has been on moving students from the proficient to the advanced range on the TCAP test in math, social studies, and science. Teachers at Elkton School are currently using multiple sources and supplemental materials that anticipate such gains

Teachers rely on the PAS test in grades 1-8 for reading, math, and science for clues on the state performance indicators that need to be addressed. Beginning in the 2008-2009 school year, students will be exposed to the social studies portion of the PAS test. Using this new test, teachers will have the advantage of searching for areas of weakness.

With the addition of a computer technology facilitator, in the 2007-2008 school year, students have been exposed to the Study Island Assessment Program in math, social studies, science, and reading. Teachers are currently using this program for instruction, practice, and testing on state performance indicators. United Streaming videos and presentations are readily available in all content areas providing instruction, practice, and enrichment. Teachers spend at least two professional development days analyzing and reviewing test data

Searching for approaches and methods that will lead to student gains.


 

Evidence of Communication with All Stakeholders – Narrative response required
What evidence do we have of our communication of the TSIPP to all stakeholders?

Information is communicated to all stakeholders in a variety of forms. At the beginning of the 2007-2008 school year, Elkton school held a very successful First Annual Open House designated to inform parents of the school’s dedication in improving student achievement. Parents met in the gymnasium and were provided with a handout with a list of frequently used terms and definitions related to student achievement including state performance indicators, benchmarks, Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System, low performing schools, etc. Parents were given an opportunity to ask questions on any term. Parents were then invited to attend informative sessions with teachers focusing on the state performance indicators, testing for the year, and teacher/student expectations.

The school website is updated regularly and provides a wealth of information to the public. The school’s mission, vision, and beliefs are available, as well as a link to information about A Blueprint for Learning: ‘The Teacher’s Guide to the Tennessee Curriculum. The Giles County School’s web page has a link to the Tennessee State Department of Education where the State Report Card information can be assessed. All teachers have a web page and may list classroom assignments, activities, and awards received.

All students receive a monthly school newsletter that provides information on the classroom and school activities. The newsletter begins with the school’s web address, mission statement, and notes to parents.

Teachers are encouraged to call or e-mail parents concerning not only student weaknesses but also successes.

Monthly faculty meetings focus on TSIPP progress, student achievement, test results, and any professional development opportunities focusing on student achievement and testing.

Grade-level teachers are encouraged to collaborate on assessment data and any other concerns dealing with student achievement.

The School Leadership Team meets regularly to discuss TSIPP progress.

Evidence of Alignment of Beliefs, Shared Vision, and Mission with Goals – Narrative response required
What evidence do we have that shows our beliefs, shared vision and mission in Component 2 align with our goals in Component 4?

During the beginning of each school year, the faculty and staff review the school’s beliefs, vision, and goals to check for continued relevancy. Changes are made as necessary. Consensus is achieved.

The committee concerning specifically Component 2 reviews the work of other component committees to check for alignment of the beliefs, vision, and mission with all parts of the TSIPP, including the goal written in

Component 4. Minutes for the meetings are on file.

 

Evidence of Alignment of Action Steps with Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Organization – Narrative response required
What evidence do we have that shows our action steps in Component 4 align with our analyses of the areas of curriculum, instruction, assessment and organization in Component 3?

Using TCAP reports, TVAAS data, and other measures, we know that our needs are in the academic areas of math, social studies, and science. We see particular needs in grades 7 and 8.

 

 

 

Suggestions for the Process – Narrative response required
What suggestions do we have for improving our planning process?

Teachers must be informed of all the components of a plan and the requirements for each component. These items should be reviewed on a regular basis.

 

TEMPLATE 5.2: Implementation Evaluation

(Rubric Indicator 5.2)

Evidence of Implementation – Narrative response required
What is our plan to begin implementation of the action steps?

Beginning with professional development time in July 2008, Elkton School goals will be reviewed along with the action steps. Action steps will be incorporated according to the assigned time schedule and the needs of the students.

 

Evidence of the Use of Data – Narrative response required
What is the plan for the use of data?

Beginning with July 2008 professional development days, teachers will begin to assess data from the previous school year. This data will be considered in assigning students to classes, in setting class schedules, and in considered different elements of the curriculum. Teachers will use the data after they are assigned a class of students to see the strengths and needs of individuals.

 

TEMPLATE 5.3: Monitoring and Adjusting Evaluation

(Rubric Indicator 5.3)

Evidence of Monitoring Dates – Narrative response required
What are the calendar dates (Nov/Dec and May/June) when the School Leadership Team will meet to sustain the Tennessee School Improvement Planning Process? Identify the person(s) responsible for monitoring and the role they will play in the monitoring process.

The School Leadership Team will meet regularly throughout the school year. In November, the Team should meet to check on accomplishments of action steps for the goals.

Rita McDonald, chairperson, Teri Mize, co-chair, and Connie Walls, co-chair, will identify actions steps that have been completed or begun. They will check the status of other action steps. They will meet with groups of teachers to help in the accomplishments of the school’s goals.

Evidence of a Process for Monitoring Plan – Narrative response required
What will be the process that the School Leadership Team will use to review the analysis of the data from the assessments and determine if adjustments need to be made in our plan?

The Leadership Team will review all data as it is released. They will review action steps that involve the use of data and look for accomplishments of those steps. When meeting as a faculty, adjustments to action steps will be made as necessary to be of the best benefit of the Elkton students.

Evidence of a Process for Adjusting Plan – Narrative response required
What will be the process that the School Leadership Team will use for adjusting our plan (person(s) responsible, timeline, actions steps, resources, evaluation strategies) when needed?

Being a relatively small school, adjustments in plans can usually be made easily. After the Leadership Team sees a need or needs for change, that information will be brought before the faculty. Adjustments of the plans would be discussed at that time. Depending on the necessary changes, the Team may make necessary assignments or may have the faculty reach consensus concerning changes.

 

Evidence of a Plan for Communicating to All Stakeholders – Narrative response required
How will the School Leadership Team communicate success/adjustments of the plan to stakeholders and solicit ongoing input from stakeholders?

The School Leadership Team will be leading the annual parent meeting during the week of school registration. At that time, parents will be informed of any necessary changes. Discussion will be held at that time allowing for comments or questions.

Parents and other stakeholders are regularly informed about school news through announcements sent home, newspaper articles, and school newsletters as well as through phone calls and emails.